Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 737877
                    [Title] => SC not a flip-flopping court
                    [Summary] => 
The recent decision of the Supreme Court to “recall” the Sept. 7  resolution of its Second Division dismissing a second motion for  reconsideration of the Philippine Airlines (PAL) because of a  “procedural lapse” or “procedural mix-up” does not show that it “flip  flopped”.
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-10-17 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1148843
                    [AuthorName] => Atty. Romulo B. Macalintal
                    [SectionName] => Letters to the Editor
                    [SectionUrl] => letters-to-the-editor
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

SECOND MOTION

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 737877
                    [Title] => SC not a flip-flopping court
                    [Summary] => 
The recent decision of the Supreme Court to “recall” the Sept. 7  resolution of its Second Division dismissing a second motion for  reconsideration of the Philippine Airlines (PAL) because of a  “procedural lapse” or “procedural mix-up” does not show that it “flip  flopped”.
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-10-17 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1148843
                    [AuthorName] => Atty. Romulo B. Macalintal
                    [SectionName] => Letters to the Editor
                    [SectionUrl] => letters-to-the-editor
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

SC not a flip-flopping court

By Atty. Romulo B. Macalintal | October 17, 2011 - 12:00am

The recent decision of the Supreme Court to “recall” the Sept. 7 resolution of its Second Division dismissing a second motion for reconsideration of the Philippine Airlines (PAL) because of a “procedural...

Letters to the Editor