+ Follow RAUL AQUINO Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 974311
[Title] => 2 paslit sugatan sa pillbox
[Summary] => Dalawang paslit ang iniulat na nasugatan makaraang tamaan ng sumabog na pillbox na inihagis ng hindi pa kilalang suspect sa Caloocan City kamakalawa ng gabi.
[DatePublished] => 2013-07-16 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 0
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => PSN Metro
[SectionUrl] => metro
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 293147
[Title] => 3 NLRC execs face Ombudsman raps
[Summary] => Three commissioners of the National Labor Relations Commission have been accused of gross ignorance of the law before the Office of the Ombudsman for reversing a 2003 dispute even though the employer had already lost the illegal dismissal case by default.
NLRC commissioners Raul Aquino, Romeo Co and Proculo Carmen should not have assumed jurisdiction over the dispute because it had already been decided with finality, according to the complainants.
[DatePublished] => 2005-08-24 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
)
)
RAUL AQUINO
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 974311
[Title] => 2 paslit sugatan sa pillbox
[Summary] => Dalawang paslit ang iniulat na nasugatan makaraang tamaan ng sumabog na pillbox na inihagis ng hindi pa kilalang suspect sa Caloocan City kamakalawa ng gabi.
[DatePublished] => 2013-07-16 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 0
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => PSN Metro
[SectionUrl] => metro
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 293147
[Title] => 3 NLRC execs face Ombudsman raps
[Summary] => Three commissioners of the National Labor Relations Commission have been accused of gross ignorance of the law before the Office of the Ombudsman for reversing a 2003 dispute even though the employer had already lost the illegal dismissal case by default.
NLRC commissioners Raul Aquino, Romeo Co and Proculo Carmen should not have assumed jurisdiction over the dispute because it had already been decided with finality, according to the complainants.
[DatePublished] => 2005-08-24 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
August 24, 2005 - 12:00am