+ Follow PROSECUTOR ROSENDO BRILLANTES Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 358915
[Title] => Should the law be that harsh?
[Summary] => This is not to question the legality of the Sandiganbayan decision convicting Asst. Prosecutor Rosendo Brillantes to 18 years as maximum for the loss of shabu valued at P223 thousand in his official custody. Under the law (Art. 217(4), RPC), when the value of the funds or property involved exceeds P22 thousand, the imposable penalty is reclusion temporal maximum to reclusion perpetua (17 years, four months and one day as minimum) with perpetual disqualification. In effect, the meted sentence is a reduced penalty.
[DatePublished] => 2006-09-19 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133156
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1471332
[AuthorName] => Lorenzo Paradiang Jr.
[SectionName] => Freeman Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
PROSECUTOR ROSENDO BRILLANTES
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 358915
[Title] => Should the law be that harsh?
[Summary] => This is not to question the legality of the Sandiganbayan decision convicting Asst. Prosecutor Rosendo Brillantes to 18 years as maximum for the loss of shabu valued at P223 thousand in his official custody. Under the law (Art. 217(4), RPC), when the value of the funds or property involved exceeds P22 thousand, the imposable penalty is reclusion temporal maximum to reclusion perpetua (17 years, four months and one day as minimum) with perpetual disqualification. In effect, the meted sentence is a reduced penalty.
[DatePublished] => 2006-09-19 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133156
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1471332
[AuthorName] => Lorenzo Paradiang Jr.
[SectionName] => Freeman Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest