Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 691828
                    [Title] => Concurrent, not exclusive
                    [Summary] => 
This case of Pete and Carmen explains the exclusive original jurisdiction of Family Court to hear and decide petitions for habeas corpus in relation to Custody of Children under Republic Act 8369.
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-06-02 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

PETE AND CARMEN

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 691828
                    [Title] => Concurrent, not exclusive
                    [Summary] => 
This case of Pete and Carmen explains the exclusive original jurisdiction of Family Court to hear and decide petitions for habeas corpus in relation to Custody of Children under Republic Act 8369.
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-06-02 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Concurrent, not exclusive

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | June 2, 2011 - 12:00am

This case of Pete and Carmen explains the exclusive original jurisdiction of Family Court to hear and decide petitions for habeas corpus in relation to Custody of Children under Republic Act 8369.

Opinion