+ Follow MR. PERLAS Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 478704
[Title] => EDITORIAL - Knock knock! Who's there? Perlas. Perlas who? Perlas ng Silanganan.
[Summary] => Nicanor Perlas announced last Wednesday his bid for the presidency in the 2010 elections.
[DatePublished] => 2009-06-19 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Freeman Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 303881
[Title] => Perjury
[Summary] => The elements of perjury under article 183 of the Revised Penal Code are: (a) that the accused made a statement under oath or executed an affidavit upon a material matter; (b) that the statement or affidavit was made before a competent officer authorized to receive and administer oath; (c) that in the statement or affidavit, the accused made a willful and deliberate assertion of falsehood; and (d) that the sworn statement or affidavit containing the falsity is required by law or made for a legal purpose. This case of Mr. Prado and Mr. Perlas explains elements (a) and (c).
[DatePublished] => 2005-10-27 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
MR. PERLAS
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 478704
[Title] => EDITORIAL - Knock knock! Who's there? Perlas. Perlas who? Perlas ng Silanganan.
[Summary] => Nicanor Perlas announced last Wednesday his bid for the presidency in the 2010 elections.
[DatePublished] => 2009-06-19 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Freeman Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 303881
[Title] => Perjury
[Summary] => The elements of perjury under article 183 of the Revised Penal Code are: (a) that the accused made a statement under oath or executed an affidavit upon a material matter; (b) that the statement or affidavit was made before a competent officer authorized to receive and administer oath; (c) that in the statement or affidavit, the accused made a willful and deliberate assertion of falsehood; and (d) that the sworn statement or affidavit containing the falsity is required by law or made for a legal purpose. This case of Mr. Prado and Mr. Perlas explains elements (a) and (c).
[DatePublished] => 2005-10-27 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
