Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 660002
                    [Title] => Character flaws
                    [Summary] => 
This case of Lino and Amy once more explains the meaning of “psychological incapacity” as envisioned by the framers of the Family Code when they drafted Article 36 patterned after the Canon Law.
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-02-24 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

LINO AND AMY

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 660002
                    [Title] => Character flaws
                    [Summary] => 
This case of Lino and Amy once more explains the meaning of “psychological incapacity” as envisioned by the framers of the Family Code when they drafted Article 36 patterned after the Canon Law.
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-02-24 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Character flaws

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | February 24, 2011 - 12:00am

This case of Lino and Amy once more explains the meaning of “psychological incapacity” as envisioned by the framers of the Family Code when they drafted Article 36 patterned after the Canon Law.

Opinion