+ Follow LAND REGISTRATION COURT Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 1515667
[Title] => Conjugal share of unfaithful wife
[Summary] => Can a wife who has abandoned her husband and lived with other men still claim her share in the conjugal properties?
[DatePublished] => 2015-10-27 10:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 695715
[Title] => The price of infidelity
[Summary] => This is the case of Laura, an unfaithful wife who still wanted to share in the conjugal properties.
[DatePublished] => 2011-06-14 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 193308
[Title] => Sufficient cause to complain
[Summary] => The well-settled rule is that a party who moves to dismiss a complaint on the ground of lack of cause of action hypothetically admits all the averments in said complaint regardless of the defenses raised in his answer. This is once more reiterated in this case of Danilo.
[DatePublished] => 2003-01-29 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
LAND REGISTRATION COURT
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 1515667
[Title] => Conjugal share of unfaithful wife
[Summary] => Can a wife who has abandoned her husband and lived with other men still claim her share in the conjugal properties?
[DatePublished] => 2015-10-27 10:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 695715
[Title] => The price of infidelity
[Summary] => This is the case of Laura, an unfaithful wife who still wanted to share in the conjugal properties.
[DatePublished] => 2011-06-14 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 193308
[Title] => Sufficient cause to complain
[Summary] => The well-settled rule is that a party who moves to dismiss a complaint on the ground of lack of cause of action hypothetically admits all the averments in said complaint regardless of the defenses raised in his answer. This is once more reiterated in this case of Danilo.
[DatePublished] => 2003-01-29 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest