Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 749401
                    [Title] => CHR: Right to travel not applicable in GMA case
                    [Summary] => 
The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) yesterday said that even though the right to travel is both a human and constitutional right, this can’t be applied in the case of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-11-19 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1685860
                    [AuthorName] => Rhodina Villanueva
                    [SectionName] => Headlines
                    [SectionUrl] => headlines
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

JEFFERSON LYNDON RAGRARIO

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 749401
                    [Title] => CHR: Right to travel not applicable in GMA case
                    [Summary] => 
The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) yesterday said that even though the right to travel is both a human and constitutional right, this can’t be applied in the case of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-11-19 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1685860
                    [AuthorName] => Rhodina Villanueva
                    [SectionName] => Headlines
                    [SectionUrl] => headlines
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

CHR: Right to travel not applicable in GMA case

By Rhodina Villanueva | November 19, 2011 - 12:00am

The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) yesterday said that even though the right to travel is both a human and constitutional right, this can’t be applied in the case of former President Gloria Macapagal-Ar...

Headlines