^
+ Follow JANUARY FEBRUARY Tag
Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 203463
                    [Title] => Terminated without prejudice
                    [Summary] => The general rule is that dismissal of a criminal case resulting in the acquittal made with the express consent of the accused or upon his own motion will not place the accused in double jeopardy thus allowing its revival. But are there instances when the criminal case dismissed with the accused’s consent may amount to double jeopardy as to prevent its revival? This is answered in this case of Benny.

[DatePublished] => 2003-04-23 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 133340 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1804883 [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison [SectionName] => Opinion [SectionUrl] => opinion [URL] => ) ) )
JANUARY FEBRUARY
Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 203463
                    [Title] => Terminated without prejudice
                    [Summary] => The general rule is that dismissal of a criminal case resulting in the acquittal made with the express consent of the accused or upon his own motion will not place the accused in double jeopardy thus allowing its revival. But are there instances when the criminal case dismissed with the accused’s consent may amount to double jeopardy as to prevent its revival? This is answered in this case of Benny.

[DatePublished] => 2003-04-23 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 133340 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1804883 [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison [SectionName] => Opinion [SectionUrl] => opinion [URL] => ) ) )
abtest
Are you sure you want to log out?
X
Login

Philstar.com is one of the most vibrant, opinionated, discerning communities of readers on cyberspace. With your meaningful insights, help shape the stories that can shape the country. Sign up now!

Get Updated:

Signup for the News Round now

FORGOT PASSWORD?
SIGN IN
or sign in with