Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1492350
                    [Title] => Defeating the purpose
                    [Summary] => 
This is another case involving R.A. 9262 otherwise known as the “Anti Violence against Women and their Children Act of 2004”. The issue here concerns the visitation rights of the erring husband. This is the case of Jim and Linda.

                    [DatePublished] => 2015-08-25 10:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

IF DAISY

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1492350
                    [Title] => Defeating the purpose
                    [Summary] => 
This is another case involving R.A. 9262 otherwise known as the “Anti Violence against Women and their Children Act of 2004”. The issue here concerns the visitation rights of the erring husband. This is the case of Jim and Linda.

                    [DatePublished] => 2015-08-25 10:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Defeating the purpose

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | August 25, 2015 - 10:00am

This is another case involving R.A. 9262 otherwise known as the “Anti Violence against Women and their Children Act of 2004”. The issue here concerns the visitation rights of the erring husband. This...

Opinion