+ Follow DORIA AND RAMIREZ Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 908225
[Title] => Reasonable action
[Summary] => A person has the right against unreasonable searches and seizures.
[DatePublished] => 2013-02-13 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 524297
[Title] => Kitang-kita ang ebidensiya
[Summary] => TUNGKOL ito sa kasong isinampa ni Abe laban sa mga pulis na sina Dario at Romy.
[DatePublished] => 2009-11-19 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 513656
[Title] => Plain view
[Summary] => In yesterday’s case (Abelita III vs. Doria and Ramirez, G.R. 170672, August 14, 2009), one of the causes of action relied upon by the Judge (Abe) who filed the case for damages against the police officers (Dario and Romy) is the violation of his right to be secure in one’s person, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
[DatePublished] => 2009-10-14 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 513326
[Title] => Valid suspicion
[Summary] => This is another case on the legality of a warrantless arrest of an offender that has just committed an offense.
[DatePublished] => 2009-10-13 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
DORIA AND RAMIREZ
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 908225
[Title] => Reasonable action
[Summary] => A person has the right against unreasonable searches and seizures.
[DatePublished] => 2013-02-13 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 524297
[Title] => Kitang-kita ang ebidensiya
[Summary] => TUNGKOL ito sa kasong isinampa ni Abe laban sa mga pulis na sina Dario at Romy.
[DatePublished] => 2009-11-19 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 513656
[Title] => Plain view
[Summary] => In yesterday’s case (Abelita III vs. Doria and Ramirez, G.R. 170672, August 14, 2009), one of the causes of action relied upon by the Judge (Abe) who filed the case for damages against the police officers (Dario and Romy) is the violation of his right to be secure in one’s person, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
[DatePublished] => 2009-10-14 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 513326
[Title] => Valid suspicion
[Summary] => This is another case on the legality of a warrantless arrest of an offender that has just committed an offense.
[DatePublished] => 2009-10-13 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest