Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 617703
                    [Title] => Judge na walang ingat
                    [Summary] => 
Ang isang judge na walang ingat sa kanyang trabaho ay may pananagutang administratibo.
                    [DatePublished] => 2010-10-05 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 
                    [AuthorName] => 
                    [SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
                    [SectionUrl] => opinyon
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 607696
                    [Title] => Lack of due diligence
                    [Summary] => 
A judge may also be administratively liable for negligence in the performance of his duties.
                    [DatePublished] => 2010-09-01 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [2] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 213597
                    [Title] => Uncoordinated moves
                    [Summary] => In the ongoing intensified campaign against dangerous drugs, the law enforcers, the prosecutors, the judiciary, the jail management and the community, known as the five pillars of the criminal justice system, play very important roles. Their roles call for close cooperation and coordination. If these five pillars are not supportive of each other, then the entire structure of a successful campaign will simply collapse. This case is a classic example of lack of coordination among the first three main pillars, the law enforcers, the prosecutors and the judiciary.


                    [DatePublished] => 2003-07-14 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

CHIEF INQUEST FISCAL

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 617703
                    [Title] => Judge na walang ingat
                    [Summary] => 
Ang isang judge na walang ingat sa kanyang trabaho ay may pananagutang administratibo.
                    [DatePublished] => 2010-10-05 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 
                    [AuthorName] => 
                    [SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
                    [SectionUrl] => opinyon
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 607696
                    [Title] => Lack of due diligence
                    [Summary] => 
A judge may also be administratively liable for negligence in the performance of his duties.
                    [DatePublished] => 2010-09-01 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [2] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 213597
                    [Title] => Uncoordinated moves
                    [Summary] => In the ongoing intensified campaign against dangerous drugs, the law enforcers, the prosecutors, the judiciary, the jail management and the community, known as the five pillars of the criminal justice system, play very important roles. Their roles call for close cooperation and coordination. If these five pillars are not supportive of each other, then the entire structure of a successful campaign will simply collapse. This case is a classic example of lack of coordination among the first three main pillars, the law enforcers, the prosecutors and the judiciary.


                    [DatePublished] => 2003-07-14 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Judge na walang ingat

October 5, 2010 - 12:00am

Ang isang judge na walang ingat sa kanyang trabaho ay may pananagutang administratibo.

PSN Opinyon

Lack of due diligence

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | September 1, 2010 - 12:00am

A judge may also be administratively liable for negligence in the performance of his duties.

Opinion

Uncoordinated moves

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | July 14, 2003 - 12:00am

In the ongoing intensified campaign against dangerous drugs, the law enforcers, the prosecutors, the judiciary, the jail management and the community, known as the five pillars of the criminal justice system, play...

Opinion