Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 213771
                    [Title] => Shabu sa bagahe
                    [Summary] => SI Mai Li, isang negosyanteng taga-Hong Kong, ay nagpunta sa Manila para magtinda ng ready-to-wear (RTW) clothes. Sa airport, habang sinusuri ni Ms. Benedicto, isang inspector ng Customs, ang mga bagahe ni Mai Li, napansin niya na may nakaumbok dito.  Iminungkahi ni Ms. Benedicto na dalhin ito sa opisina ng Custom’s Collector.


                    [DatePublished] => 2003-07-15 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 134393
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
                    [SectionUrl] => opinyon
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 212426
                    [Title] => Obstacles to the anti-drug campaign
                    [Summary] => Turf war is not the only hindrance to the renewed campaign against dangerous drugs.Ironically, our basic law itself may hamper the campaign. Under our system even notorious drug pushers,drug lords or drug traffickers already known to the police also have constitutional rights. Hence so many cases against them have been dismissed on the purely technical ground that the prohibited substances found in their possession are inadmissible in evidence because of violation of their constitutional rights against unreasonable searches or illegal arrests. Like this case of Mr.
                    [DatePublished] => 2003-07-04 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [2] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 212306
                    [Title] => Sample testing of the whole contents
                    [Summary] => To be guilty of violation of the Dangerous Drugs Act (RA 6425 as amended), it must of course be established that the substance seized from an accused is a prohibited drug. But is it necessary that the entire amount of drugs confiscated be subject to laboratory tests? And is a chemical analysis an indispensable prerequisite to establish whether the substance offered in evidence is a prohibited drug? These are the questions answered in this case of Mai Li, a Hongkong business woman selling ready to wear clothes in the Philippines.


                    [DatePublished] => 2003-07-03 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

CHE CHUN TING

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 213771
                    [Title] => Shabu sa bagahe
                    [Summary] => SI Mai Li, isang negosyanteng taga-Hong Kong, ay nagpunta sa Manila para magtinda ng ready-to-wear (RTW) clothes. Sa airport, habang sinusuri ni Ms. Benedicto, isang inspector ng Customs, ang mga bagahe ni Mai Li, napansin niya na may nakaumbok dito.  Iminungkahi ni Ms. Benedicto na dalhin ito sa opisina ng Custom’s Collector.


                    [DatePublished] => 2003-07-15 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 134393
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
                    [SectionUrl] => opinyon
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 212426
                    [Title] => Obstacles to the anti-drug campaign
                    [Summary] => Turf war is not the only hindrance to the renewed campaign against dangerous drugs.Ironically, our basic law itself may hamper the campaign. Under our system even notorious drug pushers,drug lords or drug traffickers already known to the police also have constitutional rights. Hence so many cases against them have been dismissed on the purely technical ground that the prohibited substances found in their possession are inadmissible in evidence because of violation of their constitutional rights against unreasonable searches or illegal arrests. Like this case of Mr.
                    [DatePublished] => 2003-07-04 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [2] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 212306
                    [Title] => Sample testing of the whole contents
                    [Summary] => To be guilty of violation of the Dangerous Drugs Act (RA 6425 as amended), it must of course be established that the substance seized from an accused is a prohibited drug. But is it necessary that the entire amount of drugs confiscated be subject to laboratory tests? And is a chemical analysis an indispensable prerequisite to establish whether the substance offered in evidence is a prohibited drug? These are the questions answered in this case of Mai Li, a Hongkong business woman selling ready to wear clothes in the Philippines.


                    [DatePublished] => 2003-07-03 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Shabu sa bagahe

By Jose C. Sison | July 15, 2003 - 12:00am

SI Mai Li, isang negosyanteng taga-Hong Kong, ay nagpunta sa Manila para magtinda ng ready-to-wear (RTW) clothes. Sa airport, habang sinusuri ni Ms. Benedicto, isang inspector ng Customs, ang mga bagahe ni Mai Li,...

PSN Opinyon

Obstacles to the anti-drug campaign

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | July 4, 2003 - 12:00am

Turf war is not the only hindrance to the renewed campaign against dangerous drugs.Ironically, our basic law itself may hamper the campaign. Under our system even notorious drug pushers,drug lords or drug traffickers...

Opinion

Sample testing of the whole contents

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | July 3, 2003 - 12:00am

To be guilty of violation of the Dangerous Drugs Act (RA 6425 as amended), it must of course be established that the substance seized from an accused is a prohibited drug. But is it necessary that the entire amount...

Opinion