Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 922211
                    [Title] => Thoughts on the SC’s TRO on the RH Law
                    [Summary] => 
Yes, I’m elated that the Supreme Court (SC) has issued a four-month Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against the Reproductive Health Law (RHL) and set the oral arguments for June 18th.

                    [DatePublished] => 2013-03-21 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 135522
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1805274
                    [AuthorName] => Bobit S. Avila
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

ARCHBISHOP MORELOS AND I

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 922211
                    [Title] => Thoughts on the SC’s TRO on the RH Law
                    [Summary] => 
Yes, I’m elated that the Supreme Court (SC) has issued a four-month Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against the Reproductive Health Law (RHL) and set the oral arguments for June 18th.

                    [DatePublished] => 2013-03-21 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 135522
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1805274
                    [AuthorName] => Bobit S. Avila
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Thoughts on the SC’s TRO on the RH Law

By SHOOTING STRAIGHT | By Bobit S. Avila | March 21, 2013 - 12:00am

Yes, I’m elated that the Supreme Court (SC) has issued a four-month Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against the Reproductive Health Law (RHL) and set the oral arguments for June 18th.

Opinion