^
+ Follow Anti-Bouncing Checks Law Tag
Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 2258504
                    [Title] => Maari bang ­makasuhan ng BP 22?
                    [Summary] => Pasok pa rin po ba sa kasong BP 22 kung ang account na pagkukunan ng pondo ay closed na at hindi naman pag-aari nung nag-isyu ng tseke? 
                    [DatePublished] => 2023-04-13 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 136499
                    [Focus] => 1
                    [AuthorID] => 1806236
                    [AuthorName] => Atty. Aeron Aldrich B. Halos
                    [SectionName] => Punto Mo
                    [SectionUrl] => punto-mo
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1988888
                    [Title] => Tsekeng matagal nang naisyu, malabong maging basehan ng reklamong BP 22
                    [Summary] => Nakatanggap po ako ng demand letter para sa isang tseke na inisyu ko noong isang taon pa.
                    [DatePublished] => 2020-01-30 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 136499
                    [Focus] => 1
                    [AuthorID] => 1806236
                    [AuthorName] => Atty. Aeron Aldrich B. Halos
                    [SectionName] => Punto Mo
                    [SectionUrl] => punto-mo
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [2] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1270917
                    [Title] => Unsay buhaton kun ang check nga gi-issue miuntol?
                    [Summary] => 

Ang pag-issue sa cheke nga way igong pundo usa ka kalapasan sa balaod. Dili lang usa ka balaod ang nalapas niini kondili duha. Kini mao ang kalapasan sa BP 22 kon Anti-Bouncing Checks Law ug ang ikaduha mao ang Estafa ubos sa Article 315 sa Revised Penal Code. Apan unsa bay imong buhaton kun ang cheke nga gi-issue kanimo mountol. Kana nga pangutana ang atong tubagon karon sa among column.

[DatePublished] => 2013-12-22 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 134615 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1146974 [AuthorName] => Atty. Divine Flores [SectionName] => Banat Opinyon [SectionUrl] => opinyon [URL] => ) [3] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 234838 [Title] => IBC-13 files suit vs Summit Sports for estafa, bouncing checks [Summary] => The Intercontinental Broadcasting Corp. (IBC-13) has filed charges of estafa and violation of Anti-Bouncing Checks Law before the Quezon City Prosecutor’s Office against Summit Sports World Corp. for its failure to pay the television station the amount of P30 million for airing the games of the Philippine Basketball Association (PBA).

Charged were Fidel Yu, Summit Sports’ chairman and president, lawyer Pablo Ronquillo, vice president and chief executive officer, and Frederick Orticio, director and corporate secretary.
[DatePublished] => 2004-01-12 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 133272 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1804865 [AuthorName] => Pia Lee-Brago [SectionName] => Sports [SectionUrl] => sports [URL] => ) [4] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 145342 [Title] => Relieved QC cop denies charges [Summary] => The chief of the homicide section of the Central Police District (CPD), who, with another ranking CPD official and six of their men, was ordered relieved by Metro Manila police chief Director Edgar Aglipay, denied yesterday the harassment and extortion charges made by a Filipino-Chinese businessman they had arrested for estafa.

Senior Inspector Rudy Jaraza, chief of the homicide section, said David So’s arrest was a "legitimate arrest with legal and valid warrants."
[DatePublished] => 2001-12-30 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 133272 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => [AuthorName] => [SectionName] => Metro [SectionUrl] => metro [URL] => ) ) )
Anti-Bouncing Checks Law
Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 2258504
                    [Title] => Maari bang ­makasuhan ng BP 22?
                    [Summary] => Pasok pa rin po ba sa kasong BP 22 kung ang account na pagkukunan ng pondo ay closed na at hindi naman pag-aari nung nag-isyu ng tseke? 
                    [DatePublished] => 2023-04-13 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 136499
                    [Focus] => 1
                    [AuthorID] => 1806236
                    [AuthorName] => Atty. Aeron Aldrich B. Halos
                    [SectionName] => Punto Mo
                    [SectionUrl] => punto-mo
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1988888
                    [Title] => Tsekeng matagal nang naisyu, malabong maging basehan ng reklamong BP 22
                    [Summary] => Nakatanggap po ako ng demand letter para sa isang tseke na inisyu ko noong isang taon pa.
                    [DatePublished] => 2020-01-30 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 136499
                    [Focus] => 1
                    [AuthorID] => 1806236
                    [AuthorName] => Atty. Aeron Aldrich B. Halos
                    [SectionName] => Punto Mo
                    [SectionUrl] => punto-mo
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [2] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1270917
                    [Title] => Unsay buhaton kun ang check nga gi-issue miuntol?
                    [Summary] => 

Ang pag-issue sa cheke nga way igong pundo usa ka kalapasan sa balaod. Dili lang usa ka balaod ang nalapas niini kondili duha. Kini mao ang kalapasan sa BP 22 kon Anti-Bouncing Checks Law ug ang ikaduha mao ang Estafa ubos sa Article 315 sa Revised Penal Code. Apan unsa bay imong buhaton kun ang cheke nga gi-issue kanimo mountol. Kana nga pangutana ang atong tubagon karon sa among column.

[DatePublished] => 2013-12-22 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 134615 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1146974 [AuthorName] => Atty. Divine Flores [SectionName] => Banat Opinyon [SectionUrl] => opinyon [URL] => ) [3] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 234838 [Title] => IBC-13 files suit vs Summit Sports for estafa, bouncing checks [Summary] => The Intercontinental Broadcasting Corp. (IBC-13) has filed charges of estafa and violation of Anti-Bouncing Checks Law before the Quezon City Prosecutor’s Office against Summit Sports World Corp. for its failure to pay the television station the amount of P30 million for airing the games of the Philippine Basketball Association (PBA).

Charged were Fidel Yu, Summit Sports’ chairman and president, lawyer Pablo Ronquillo, vice president and chief executive officer, and Frederick Orticio, director and corporate secretary.
[DatePublished] => 2004-01-12 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 133272 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1804865 [AuthorName] => Pia Lee-Brago [SectionName] => Sports [SectionUrl] => sports [URL] => ) [4] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 145342 [Title] => Relieved QC cop denies charges [Summary] => The chief of the homicide section of the Central Police District (CPD), who, with another ranking CPD official and six of their men, was ordered relieved by Metro Manila police chief Director Edgar Aglipay, denied yesterday the harassment and extortion charges made by a Filipino-Chinese businessman they had arrested for estafa.

Senior Inspector Rudy Jaraza, chief of the homicide section, said David So’s arrest was a "legitimate arrest with legal and valid warrants."
[DatePublished] => 2001-12-30 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 133272 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => [AuthorName] => [SectionName] => Metro [SectionUrl] => metro [URL] => ) ) )
abtest
Are you sure you want to log out?
X
Login

Philstar.com is one of the most vibrant, opinionated, discerning communities of readers on cyberspace. With your meaningful insights, help shape the stories that can shape the country. Sign up now!

Get Updated:

Signup for the News Round now

FORGOT PASSWORD?
SIGN IN
or sign in with