+ Follow AGABON Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 1419980
[Title] => SAF survivor urged: Go back, tell the real story
[Summary] => Knowing their team was running out of bullets, one of the elite cops who died in the clash in Maguindanao “forced” his buddy to leave him “so someone could go back safely and tell their real story.”
[DatePublished] => 2015-02-04 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 0
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1096410
[AuthorName] => Aie Balagtas See
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 274510
[Title] => Cash equivalent of ‘belated due process’: Is it P30,000 or P50,000?
[Summary] => A couple of weeks ago, my former mentor and now fellow partner in the firm, Mr. Rio Manibog came out with an article in this column entitled "Dismiss now, pay later." His satirical observation was opportune in view of the abandonment by the Supreme Court en banc of the much earlier en banc ruling in the case of Serrano (323 SCRA 445 [2000]). In the 2004 landmark labor case of Agabon et al. (G.R.No. 158693, Nov. 17, 2004).
[DatePublished] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 135291
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1657055
[AuthorName] => POINT OF LAW By Jefferson M. Marquez
[SectionName] => Business
[SectionUrl] => business
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 271907
[Title] => Dismiss now, pay later
[Summary] => In the dismissal of an employee, the requirements of substantive and procedural due process have to be complied with. The first means that there should be a cause for the dismissal; while the second pertains to affording the employee the opportunity to be heard. It is well settled that in the absence of both requirements, or if the dismissal is bereft of any cause, there is illegal dismissal.
[DatePublished] => 2005-03-29 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 135291
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1657044
[AuthorName] => POINT OF LAW By Emiterio C. Manibog Jr.
[SectionName] => Business
[SectionUrl] => business
[URL] =>
)
)
)
AGABON
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 1419980
[Title] => SAF survivor urged: Go back, tell the real story
[Summary] => Knowing their team was running out of bullets, one of the elite cops who died in the clash in Maguindanao “forced” his buddy to leave him “so someone could go back safely and tell their real story.”
[DatePublished] => 2015-02-04 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 0
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1096410
[AuthorName] => Aie Balagtas See
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 274510
[Title] => Cash equivalent of ‘belated due process’: Is it P30,000 or P50,000?
[Summary] => A couple of weeks ago, my former mentor and now fellow partner in the firm, Mr. Rio Manibog came out with an article in this column entitled "Dismiss now, pay later." His satirical observation was opportune in view of the abandonment by the Supreme Court en banc of the much earlier en banc ruling in the case of Serrano (323 SCRA 445 [2000]). In the 2004 landmark labor case of Agabon et al. (G.R.No. 158693, Nov. 17, 2004).
[DatePublished] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 135291
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1657055
[AuthorName] => POINT OF LAW By Jefferson M. Marquez
[SectionName] => Business
[SectionUrl] => business
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 271907
[Title] => Dismiss now, pay later
[Summary] => In the dismissal of an employee, the requirements of substantive and procedural due process have to be complied with. The first means that there should be a cause for the dismissal; while the second pertains to affording the employee the opportunity to be heard. It is well settled that in the absence of both requirements, or if the dismissal is bereft of any cause, there is illegal dismissal.
[DatePublished] => 2005-03-29 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 135291
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1657044
[AuthorName] => POINT OF LAW By Emiterio C. Manibog Jr.
[SectionName] => Business
[SectionUrl] => business
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
