Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 414619
                    [Title] => Reasonable and unreasonable
                    [Summary] => 
These cases of transcendental importance and paramount interest involve the constitutionality of Section 36 (c), (d), (f) and (g) of R.A. 9165, otherwise known as, the “Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002”.
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-11-13 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

ADDITIONALLY SECTION

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 414619
                    [Title] => Reasonable and unreasonable
                    [Summary] => 
These cases of transcendental importance and paramount interest involve the constitutionality of Section 36 (c), (d), (f) and (g) of R.A. 9165, otherwise known as, the “Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002”.
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-11-13 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Reasonable and unreasonable

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | November 13, 2008 - 12:00am

These cases of transcendental importance and paramount interest involve the constitutionality of Section 36 (c), (d), (f) and (g) of R.A. 9165, otherwise known as, the “Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act...

Opinion