Gi-indosar ba ni Noynoy ang RH Bill?

Tubag ni Atty. Jose C. Sison, sa iyang column sa Philippine Star: “Definitely not; not even once did he mention the bill or directly and explicitly urge Congress to approve it.”

Tinuod, sa taas kaayo nga SONA ni Noynoy, wala gyud siya mo-mention sa RH Bill, ug labaw pang wala moaghat sa Kongreso pagpa-approve niini. Unsa may sulti ni Noynoy? Ania:

“We are ending the backlog in the education sector but the potential for shortages remains as our student population continues to increase. Perhaps responsible parenthood can help address this.”

Ang mga Pro-RH Bill diha sa gallery hilabihang pamakpak, kay ang pulong ‘responsible parenthood,’ ilang gi-associate sa RH Bill. Ug karon, gusto na sila nga dalion pag-approve sa Kongreso ang maong bill, aron makasugod na sila’g pamalit og condom. Unsa bay ilang gidalian uy, nga naa may daghan condom sa aseras?

Gani, wala man maniguro si Noynoy kun ang responsible parenthood maka-address ba sa growing student population … hinungdan nga migamit siya’g pulong “perhaps.” Lagmit, migamit si Noynoy sa pulong responsible parenthood pinasikad sa gimbut-an sa Constitution nga nagkanayon: “The State shall defend the right of the spouses to found a family in accordance with their religious convictions and the demands of responsible parenthood.”

Mao bay buot ipasabot sa atong Batakang Balaud nga ang responsible parenthood, nagkahulogan og pamalit og condom, pag-encourage sa abortion ug pagpatuyang sa sexual urges basta di lang momabdos? Responsible parenthood ba ni?

Mipadayon si Sison: “The ‘demands of responsible parenthood’ contemplated by this particular provision (atong gikutlo sa itaas), necessarily includes the protection of ‘the life of the mother and the life of the unborn from the moment of conception’ as mandated in Article II Section 12 of the Charter.”

Klaro kaayo nga ang RH Bill nila ni Miriam ug Pia, nahisupak sa giingon sa Constitution nga “responsbile parenthood,” kay matud ni Sison: “The RH Bill provides for universal access to all sorts of artificial contraceptives that have already been medically proven to cause abortion or to force couple to resort to abortion because of unwanted pregnancies.”

So, kuyaw ang RH Bill, physically ug morally. Hinoon, alang niadtong nagtinguha pag-ban sa Ginoo gikan sa atong pagpuyo ug sa inadlaw natong pagpanginabuhi, maayo ang RH Bill.

“Clearly,” padayon ni Sison: “the RH bill is not about ‘responsible parenthood,’ because it provides access to artificial contraceptives that endangers the life and health of the mother and the unborn from the moment of conception and because it impairs the right of couples to found a family in accordance with their religious convictions.”