EDITORIAL - Why we address Michael Rama as “former mayor”

Michael Rama, the former mayor of Cebu City, was dismissed from public service by the Office of the Ombudsman due to nepotism and grave misconduct. This decision has significant implications for how we address him moving forward.

First and foremost, addressing Michael Rama as "former mayor" acknowledges the legal and ethical standards upheld by the Ombudsman. The anti-graft office ruled that Rama's actions, specifically the hiring of his wife's brothers as casual employees in City Hall, violated civil service rules.

By adhering to his new title, we respect the integrity of the legal process and the principles of accountability and transparency in public service.

Rama may argue that nothing is final until the Supreme Court decides. However, this does not negate the fact that the legal process was followed during his vice mayor's assumption of the City Hall's highest post.

Addressing Rama as "former mayor" is a matter of public record and historical accuracy. It reflects the reality of his tenure and the circumstances of his departure from office. This is crucial for maintaining an accurate historical account and ensuring that future generations understand the context of his dismissal.

Referring to Rama as "former mayor" is not only a matter of legal and ethical correctness but also a step towards fostering a culture of accountability and transparency in public service.

It is a title that reflects the reality of his actions and their consequences, serving as a reminder of the standards we expect from our public officials.

Yes, we respect Rama's decision to assert that he remains the legal mayor of the city, given his election in 2022. However, following the Ombudsman's ruling, and the installation of a new mayor, he must also acknowledge that he is no longer in charge and that someone else is now managing the city's affairs.