I used to hold Isko Moreno in high esteem when he was the new mayor of Manila and seemed intent on cleaning it up, figuratively and literally. My wife Beng and I were once on one of our regular sorties to the Japan-surplus shops along Avenida Rizal when we heard a great commotion outside, and when we looked, a team from the mayor’s office was spraying the street with jets of water and making sure the sidewalks were clear of obstructions.
When he announced his bid for the presidency and came out with that beautifully produced “Ako si Isko” commercial – before Leni Robredo entered the race – I thought he was a viable prospect. I even told Beng and my mother, who had their misgivings, that I would vote for Isko if Leni didn’t run because he checked all the boxes: coming out of poverty, visibly on the job, willing to stand up to presidential bullying, good-looking and passably articulate. Even his sometimes broken English was no problem and might even have been endearing, proof positive of his struggle to learn the language of another class.
I was similarly impressed by Ping Lacson’s command of governmental matters and his coolness under fire, and especially by his refusal to avail himself of his pork-barrel allocations. I might even have been willing to give him the benefit of the doubt – a huge doubt bordering on certainty – on the Kuratong Baleleng murder case if it came down to that. I recall having been in the Senate gallery in 2003 – the UP Charter was also up for deliberation then – when Lacson took to the floor, put up a screen and with devastating efficiency and cutting sarcasm laid a trail of dashes connecting the First Gentleman to the mythical “Jose Pidal.” After the presidential debates – and as Isko’s sheen began to dull and darken – I began to think, like many others, that he would have been a great No. 2 (whether as vice president, or second choice).
But whatever remaining palatability Isko Moreno had – dragging Ping Lacson along (Norberto Gonzales we can kindly ignore) – vanished with that Easter Sunday gripe session masquerading as a press conference that only revealed their pettiness of mind and character. It wasn’t even just what they said – for which they would’ve already been raked over the coals hundreds of times before this column comes out – but the way Isko in particular handled the post-presscon flak that sticks in the craw.
Given a chance to refocus his sights on Ferdinand Marcos Jr. instead of yapping at Leni’s heels, Isko doubled down on his silly dare for Leni to stand aside and let him take on Marcos Jr. one on one, claiming that he owned the “everyone-who-can’t-stand-Leni” vote, next to the frontrunner. And no, said his manager, it wasn’t some impulsive remark brought on by the summer heat. It was all thought out; they’d made their calculations – Leni had hit her ceiling, and Isko, well, his ceiling was higher.
Which has to make one wonder: how did he think he was going to get there? Did he imagine he’d inherit a suddenly headless Pink Army, and merge that with a gazillion Leni haters defecting from the Marcos camp (and his bottomless war chest)? What about the “everyone-who-can’t-stand-Isko” vote, which can only have ballooned after his stunt? And no, Leni Robredo isn’t some sidewalk obstruction to shove out of the way.
Dissociating himself from Isko’s call, Ping Lacson said that he “didn’t see it coming,” which of course was possible, but troubling for someone supposed to be a consummate tactician. Should he have been bothered that Isko upstaged him, or even more, insulted that Isko didn’t even care to ask him to withdraw as well, given his deep-frozen standing in the polls?
Manny Pacquiao dodged a bullet by what his manager called “divine intervention” – a congested airport – and so was able to land and perch on a square foot of moral high ground. Giving the Almighty more work to do (after all the “acts of God” recently being attributed to Him), Pacquiao also explained that only God could change his mind about running.
Leody de Guzman did the smart thing and enjoyed his halo-halo in South Cotabato. Whatever happens, I think history will salute Ka Leody’s albeit largely symbolic candidacy, as an example of pushing principles over percentages.
Leni Robredo ignored the press conference and asked her Kakampinks to do so as well, training their attention on the remaining weeks of the campaign – and on the frontrunner.
Frontrunner Marcos Jr. may have had the best time of all, laughing his head off at the Easter show. (When a Facebook friend asked if he might have paid for the presscon bill, I told her that those fellows couldn’t have come that cheaply.)
It’s a sad turn of events – and I’m not being facetious here in any way – because it would have been good for our democracy and for our people to have had truly worthy and viable candidates to choose from, to offer hope beyond May 9 in a new breed of political leaders willing to stand up to despots, kleptocrats, bullies, monsters and crooks – and children thereof. Instead we see politicians willing to do and say anything to win – even if they won’t, which only make it doubly sad and puzzling. By holding that pointless presscon – the more expensive equivalent of an email blast announcing “I’m alive!” – the three men merely highlighted the singular fitness of Mrs. Robredo to take on Marcos Jr. for the presidency.
Come May 10, either Marcos Jr. or Robredo will have won. That will leave all the others as also-rans, some of whom will take their loss with grace and dignity, some of whom will protest to high heaven, some of whom will count their net income and some of whom will look for someone else to blame.
You can be an also-ran and hold your head high, prepared to fight for the people again not six years down the road, but all the years in between. You can also be an also-ran whom people will be happy to consign to oblivion, having revealed how desperate, how foolish and how nasty you can get just to be called “Mr. President.”
* * *
Email me at jose@dalisay.ph and visit my blog at www.penmanila.ph.