EDITORIAL - Speedy justice

Advocates of the strengthening of the rule of law should hope that this case will set a precedent. Last month, Manila Regional Trial Court Branch 40 Judge Alfredo Ampuan cleared Francisco Maneja Jr. of drug charges filed by the police.

This case has several remarkable elements. One is that Maneja had been shot and left for dead by the police officers who said he had resisted arrest or “nanlaban” during a drug bust in a restaurant in Malate, Manila. Maneja survived by playing dead and, as recorded on video, moved only when journalists arrived.

The second remarkable aspect is that a tricycle driver like Maneja managed to receive justice in this country where there is a perception that justice is often for sale. Credit can be given to the Public Attorney’s Office, which defended him. In clearing Maneja last Aug. 6 and ordering his release, Judge Ampuan observed that details of the alleged drug sting that led to a purported shootout appeared to be implausible.

Also remarkable is the speed of adjudication. Maneja was shot on Sept. 13, 2016. Two years may be a long time in some countries to resolve a case, but this is lightning speed in the Philippines, especially in a drug case wherein the defendant is acquitted.

If the criminal justice system can move at this speed, there is likely to be less public support for lethal short cuts to law enforcement. Jail congestion can be eased. Even the police would want a speedy resolution of criminal cases. A court conviction proves that police officers have done their job and caught the right suspects. It also means fewer court appearances for the arresting officers.

Administrators of the judiciary must institutionalize this speed in resolving court cases. If this happens, the country will know that justice is working and the rule of law will prevail.