Tdap vaccine safety comparable with Td for seniors

The tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine was as safe in seniors as the tetanus diphtheria vaccine, a finding that supports a federal recommendation to reduce pertussis risk among the elderly via Tdap vaccination.

The findings offer “empirical safety data to suggest that [the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’] recommendation for immunizing adults 65 years and older with Tdap to reduce the risk of pertussis in the elderly and their contacts should not have untoward safety consequences,” noted authors in Kaiser Permanente Southern California.

A total of 36,078 pertussis cases have been reported this year through mid-November in the United States — the highest rate in 5 decades.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that the pertussis vaccine be administered to babies over 2 months, children, adolescents, and adults, including pregnant women and seniors. In 2010, ACIP recommended a single dose of Tdap for seniors instead of Td, if they had not already received Tdap.

But with limited safety data on Tdap’s use among adults 65 years and older, “evaluation of the safety of the vaccine in this population becomes essential,” the study authors noted.

Study used data from seven HMOs participating in the Vaccine Safety Datalink Project. The investigators first used a matched-cohort design to compare safety.

Atotal of 119,573 adults 65 years and older received the Tdap vaccine between Jan. 1, 2006, and Dec. 31, 2010. All participants had been continuously enrolled in their HMO for a year before vaccination and until at least 84 days afterward.

The adverse events in the Tdap group were compared with those of 119,573 seniors in the same HMOs who received the Td vaccine in the same period. Patients were matched based on sex, site, season (April-October, November-March) and age group (65-69 years, 70-74 years, 75 years and older).

The researchers examined seven categories of adverse events: Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS); brachial neutritis; paralytic syndromes; medically attended inflammatory or allergic events; cranial nerve disorders (including Bell’s palsy); “anaphylaxis and generalized reaction”; and meningitis, encephalitis, and encephalopathy.

Incidence of these adverse events was comparable between the Tdap and Td cohorts, after records reviews confirmed diagnosis.

The researchers also assessed safety with a self-controlled case series. Time periods in which adverse events occurred in Tdap-vaccinated patients were compared with subsequent periods of the same length, starting the day after each adverse event’s risk window ended.

AI adverse events except “medically attended inflammatory or allergic events” were similar.

During the risk window, 612 patients experienced an inflammatory or allergic event, compared with 385 in the comparison time frame, for an incidence risk ratio of 1.59. this elevated risk matches past clinical trials data and VAERS reports.

Overall, “the risk of the prespecified events following Tdap s comparable to that following Td vaccination in the elderly population,” the investigators noted.