Among men who have a baseline prostate-specific antigen level above the median for their age, being African American and having a positive family history are predictive of future cancer. But a high baseline reading was a more powerful overall predictor than were the two other factors in a study of 26,111 men.
It was said at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association that the effect of (elevated) baseline PSA is so strong that it even holds true for men with two risk factors. Compared with both race and family history, “baseline, PSA reading is a more powerful clinical tool when it comes to predicting future risk of prostate cancer.”
It is widely accepted that African American men and those with a strong family history of prostate cancer are at increased risk. “Having a baseline PSA level above the age-specific median has also been shown to increase risk, but has not been incorporated into most prostate cancer guidelines.”
The aim of the study was to determine if race, family history, or PSA was the most important predictor of risk. “Prostate cancer is a very common disease. Three standard risk factors are age, race, and family history. And we are learning more and more about PSA values and how to use that to predict who will develop prostate cancer.
The participants volunteered in 1991-2001 for PSA testing and digital rectal examination. Researchers assessed both African American men and white men with and without family histories of prostate cancer and then stratified them by age. In all, 329 men both were African American and reported a positive family history.
Researchers compared outcomes for three groups: men in their 40s, 50s and 60s and older. Mean follow-up was 20 months, 71 months and 81 months, respectively, in these age groups. There were equal numbers of men in each group with a baseline PSA above and below their age-specific median, 0.7 ng/mL for men in their 40s, 0.9 ng/mL for men in their 50s, and 1.4 ng/mL for men in their 60s and older.
The results show that men who are African American and have a family history of prostate cancer and a baseline (PSA) below the median had a very low prevalence of prostate cancer.
There were no cancers among patients with both risk factors and a lower PSA level in the 40 and 50 year old age group. But three (14%) men aged 60 years or older developed prostate cancer during follow-up. In contrast, among men with both risk factors and a PSA level above the median cancer prevalence rates rose with age: 8% for men in their 40s, 16% for men in their 50s, and 30% for men aged 60 and older.
The findings could lead to highly individualized screening for prostate cancer based on a man’s baseline PSA value and how it relates to established, age-specific medians.
Nine major professional organizations issue prostate cancer-screening guidelines, but only the National Comprehensive Cancer Network currently recommends a baseline PSA test starting at age 40 should have a baseline PSA measured.
The American Urological Association PSA Best Practice Guidelines from 2000 recommend PSA screening beginning at age 50, although a lower minimum age is under consideration for an update to be released this year.
If you can know one fact about the patient, the PSA is what you want to know, said the Urologic surgery at Duke University, Durham, N.C. And if you are low at age 40, you may not need to repeat it for five years.