EDITORIAL  Enforcing a deployment ban
May 8, 2007 | 12:00am
There is no ban on the deployment of Filipino workers in Nigeria. But after eight Filipino workers were kidnapped together with three South Korean executives on Thursday last week in the southern part of Nigeria, Manila ordered the evacuation of all the other Filipinos from that country. The captives were working on a construction site for a power plant.
Even if Manila imposed a deployment ban in Nigeria, the numerous job opportunities in the oil-rich country are likely to prove irresistible for Filipinos seeking employment abroad. Not even the stories of beatings and starvation while in captivity, narrated by one of the hostages, are likely to dissuade Filipinos from accepting jobs in Nigeria.
Filipinos have also defied the government’s travel ban in Iraq. Among the most prominent of these workers are truck driver Angelo de la Cruz, whose abduction by Iraqi gunmen forced Manila to withdraw its token humanitarian contingent from Iraq, as well as the worker who died in a rocket attack on the Green Zone last week.
After De la Cruz was rewarded with a hero’s welcome plus a house and lot and scholarships for his children for his defiance, it was inevitable that other workers would follow in his footsteps. Nearly three years after his abduction, Filipinos continue to defy the travel ban, risking their lives and then expecting their government to bail them out when they run into trouble.
This need not be the case. There are ways of effectively enforcing a deployment ban. One is by revoking the license of any recruiter who defies the ban or goes around it by sending workers to Iraq through a circuitous route to avoid detection. Apart from losing his license, the recruiter should be required to pay stiff fines and face criminal charges for human trafficking.
The government must launch an aggressive information campaign about the deployment ban. Any worker who willfully defies the ban should also be punished. Recidivists should be meted the heaviest penalty: immediate repatriation if he is abroad, and a permanent prohibition from working overseas. Unless recruiters and workers alike are made to realize that disregarding a deployment ban carries penalties too heavy to make it worth the risk, we will continue to see Filipinos in trouble spots around the world finding themselves in the wrong place, at the wrong time.
Even if Manila imposed a deployment ban in Nigeria, the numerous job opportunities in the oil-rich country are likely to prove irresistible for Filipinos seeking employment abroad. Not even the stories of beatings and starvation while in captivity, narrated by one of the hostages, are likely to dissuade Filipinos from accepting jobs in Nigeria.
Filipinos have also defied the government’s travel ban in Iraq. Among the most prominent of these workers are truck driver Angelo de la Cruz, whose abduction by Iraqi gunmen forced Manila to withdraw its token humanitarian contingent from Iraq, as well as the worker who died in a rocket attack on the Green Zone last week.
After De la Cruz was rewarded with a hero’s welcome plus a house and lot and scholarships for his children for his defiance, it was inevitable that other workers would follow in his footsteps. Nearly three years after his abduction, Filipinos continue to defy the travel ban, risking their lives and then expecting their government to bail them out when they run into trouble.
This need not be the case. There are ways of effectively enforcing a deployment ban. One is by revoking the license of any recruiter who defies the ban or goes around it by sending workers to Iraq through a circuitous route to avoid detection. Apart from losing his license, the recruiter should be required to pay stiff fines and face criminal charges for human trafficking.
The government must launch an aggressive information campaign about the deployment ban. Any worker who willfully defies the ban should also be punished. Recidivists should be meted the heaviest penalty: immediate repatriation if he is abroad, and a permanent prohibition from working overseas. Unless recruiters and workers alike are made to realize that disregarding a deployment ban carries penalties too heavy to make it worth the risk, we will continue to see Filipinos in trouble spots around the world finding themselves in the wrong place, at the wrong time.
BrandSpace Articles
<
>
- Latest
- Trending
Trending
Latest
Latest
Recommended
December 2, 2024 - 12:00am