Combined oral contraceptives remain the first line of treatment for women who desired birth control or cycle control with contraceptive steroids. Although much effort has been directed toward minimizing their potential thromboembolic and cardiovascular disease risks, much less attention has been given to their metabolic effects, wrote scientific director of the Woman’s Health Research Institute in Baton Rouge, L.A.
There is some evidence that oral contraceptives may aggravate insulin resistance and exert other metabolic effects that might increase a women’s long-term risk for diabetes and heart disease. Delivering low-dose oral contraceptives via a non-oral route such as the vaginal ring might provide efficacy and good cycle control with less risk. To test this, the investigators randomized 30 women aged 18-40 years to either the vaginal ring or to a low-dose monophasic oral contraceptive for five continuous menstrual cycles. They tested the effects of both methods of birth control on carbohydrate metabolism, using insulin sensitivity indices derived from fasting and oral glucose tolerance tests.
All patients were similar with regard to age, weight, and metabolic parameters at baseline. However, by the end of the treatment period, the researchers noted that insulin sensitivity measured with a glucose tolerance test was significantly decreased in women taking the oral contraceptive pill, compared with women using the vaginal ring. The pill also significantly increased insulin resistance from baseline to after the treatment period when fasting levels alone were measured.
The study confirms that low-dose oral contraceptives can adversely impact metabolic function. So many women of reproductive age have insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes.