The head of a government panel of engineers investigating the airport’s problems was cited by the Straits Times as complaining about "cracks" in the runways and taxiways at the airport, a faulty baggage scanning system, a lack of public toilets, non-existent signage, crowded arrival and departure halls due to an excess of concessionaires, and other such defects.
But the very next day, on the front page of the international Herald Tribune, there was also a story, this time quoting the same government investigating panel as saying that reports of damages to runways and taxiways at the airport were "significantly overblown." There were no cracks in the asphalt, but ruts in the taxiways which could easily be fixed, said the panel.
There seems to be agreement that the ruts or the few hairline cracks seen in a small area of the runways do not pose a safety hazard for the airlines now utilizing the airport. There have been no reported incidents on take-off or landing of aircraft and there have been no operational complaints from airline airport staff. This kind of "damage," says a member of the investigating body, is "common," even in US airports.
Some friends of mine who’ve used Suvarnabhumi, mostly European frequent travelers, profess puzzlement at the brouhaha over what they deem to be simple normal start-up problems at a major international airport, particularly one with the mega-size of the Bangkok facility which is intended to handle up to 45 million passengers a year.
Cantankerous baggage carousels, long walks to airline gates, overcrowded passenger halls, among other inconveniences, are par for the course, they insist, but are eventually sorted out by airport personnel. They shared with me more horrific stories about their own misadventures in other new airports in Europe, the US and Asia.
I don’t know if being travel veterans has taught my peripatetic friends to be a lot more forgiving than other airline pax who, the Thai investigating panel claims, have been bitching about Suvarnabhumi. But it does seem to me that the problems of the spanking new Bangkok airport are inextricably bound with the fate, or perceived future plans, of the former Prime Minister, Thaksin Shinawatra.
That’s because the military-run government now ensconced in Thailand seems bent on proving that the Thaksin government rushed the new airport into completion and that the entire process was riddled with corruption, which is why the new facility has supposedly turned up so many problems.
As the head of the investigating panel told the Foreign Correspondent Club of Thailand last week, "Even though we spent a lot of money (about US$4 billion), supposedly for a five-star airport, we got a three-star airport."
Even that assessment is too generous, if a former consultant to the airport authority is correct. He is certain that further investigation will uncover more problems: "What we’re seeing today is just the tip of the iceberg." He alleges that every aspect of the project – the duty-free concessions, the parking lot construction, the baggage system – "has got something hidden underneath."
Those are the claims of non-admirers of Thaksin. The problem is that, so far, no concrete evidence has been produced by investigators, including those of the ruling Council for National Security which has sworn to file charges against the former premier by the end of this month.
Suvarnabhumi has become such a sticking point for Thaksin defenders and opponents because, it has to be said, the former PM made the airport a showcase project. With good reason, since the airport had been on the drawing boards since the 1960s, well over four decades. Previous Thai PMs had failed to get the project done, but Thaksin managed to get the facility, touted as a regional hub which would take business away from Hongkong and Singapore, completed during his five-year tenure.
The question, however, is at what cost and whether the rushed construction was tainted by rampant and pervasive corruption. Indeed, corruption is one of the battle cries against Thaksin. The military junta’s CNS is now looking into 52 alleged graft cases.
Essentially too, military leaders are concerned that Thaksin, despite his repeated disclaimers, is really preparing for a comeback and has a substantial kitty stashed in foreign banks to make that happen. In fact, they think he or forces still loyal to him were responsible for those New Year’s Eve bombings in Bangkok. Those bombings, incidentally, have yet to be solved by the government now in power.
When asked directly by Newsweek magazine recently, Thaksin flatly denied charges of corruption, calling them "baseless," as well as any intentions of making a comeback. He insisted he has no further political ambitions, and is "calling it quits."
In that Newsweek interview, he joked that, in place of his old party, the abolished Thai Rak Thai (Thais Love Thais), he is organizing a new party called the Enjoy Life Party. Thaksin says the platform of his new party will be to play golf, travel, relax, and meet friends. His new slogan, the exiled PM says, is: "Don’t be too serious about life."
No one’s laughing at that attempt at comedy. Others, it would seem, are still taking him pretty seriously. For example, Newsweek says this: "Even as the citified middle class rallied for months to dislodge him from office, rural masses clung to a leader whose populist policies were seen as evidence of his devotion to the poor."
The ruling junta also seems unconvinced Thaksin has called it quits, despite his quips about now wanting to simply play golf and enjoy life.
In context, therefore, the debate about alleged defects at Suvarnabhumi may only partly be about construction or corruption, it may actually be more a reflection of deep and unresolved divisions still hounding Thailand these days.