The analysis, at the Broad Institute in Cambridge, Massachusetts, sets up a serious conflict between the date of the split as indicated by fossil skulls, about 7 million years ago, and the much younger date implied by genetic analysis, as late as 5.4 million years ago. The conflict can be resolved, team suggests in an article published in Thursdays Nature, if there were in fact two splits between the human and chimp lineages, with the first being followed by interbreeding between the two populations and then a second split.
The suggestion of a hybridization has startled paleoanthropologists, who nonetheless are treating the new genetic data seriously. The earliest human-lineage fossil remains, like Sahelanthropus, seem clearly to have been bipeds, walking on two feet, but the ancestors of chimps presumably on their two feet and the knuckles of their hands, as do modern chimps.
If the earliest hominids are bipedal, its hard to think of them interbreeding with the knuckle-walking chimps its not what we had in mind, said by a biological anthropologist at Harvard.