EDITORIAL - A larger battle

Amid the continuing political disturbance, it’s a wonder that the Senate managed to ratify two international treaties on environmental protection – a subject that rarely elicits excitement in the legislature. The two treaties seek to ban consumer products that use substances and technology that contribute to the depletion of the ozone layer. The Senate’s ratification coincided with the observance of Consumer Protection Week. Eliminating substances that contribute to global warming, however, aims to protect not only consumers but also the entire planet.

The phenomenon of global warming is not yet fully understood, but certain things are becoming clear: it is altering weather patterns and consequently threatening the existence of certain species because of the destruction of natural habitats. Scientists are watching the effects of the rapid melting of glaciers and polar ice caps on marine life and coastal communities.

While the phenomenon is not yet fully understood, experts have identified most of the culprits behind global warming. Among the biggest causes are products that emit chlorofluorocarbons or CFC, which deplete the ozone layer. Many industrialized nations have adopted technologies that reduce CFC emissions, churning out consumer products that are kinder on the environment. But there are still many products around, especially in developing countries such as the Philippines, that deplete the ozone layer. These products include certain brands of refrigerators, air conditioners, pesticides, solvents and even hair sprays.

The Senate’s ratification of the international treaties is a welcome development. It remains to be seen whether the country can abide by the provisions of the treaties. This country is notorious for having too many laws and too little enforcement. The environment police cannot even properly enforce the Clean Air Act. Residents of Metro Manila continue to be poisoned by exhaust fumes mostly from poorly maintained trucks, public utility vehicles and motorcycles. A treaty is even less binding than the law. Can the government go after manufacturers and distributors of CFC-emitting products? Senate ratification of the international treaties was just one victory in a larger battle.