EDITORIAL - Lost case
November 14, 2003 | 12:00am
There cant be any political motivation in this case, so the evidence must truly be insufficient for the extradition of Roger Lawrence Strunk. Yesterday a US court rejected the Philippine governments request to have Strunk sent back to Manila for trial. Strunk, widower of murdered movie star Nida Blanca, left the Philippines for the United States on Jan. 10 last year for his mothers funeral, promising to return to face accusations that he was behind the killing of his wife. No one believed he would return, and the Philippine government eventually had to seek his extradition.
Now the case appears headed for the dustbin of unsolved crimes. The courts rejection is not entirely surprising, considering that the principal witness against Strunk is Philip Medel, a shady character in the same league as scam artist Ador Mawanay. Medel had confessed to the National Bureau of Investigation that he was hired by Strunk to kill the actress. Soon after, Medel was on TV having a convulsive fit, claiming he was tortured into confessing to the crime. The NBI said Medels original testimony remained valid despite his subsequent recantation. Other witnesses were eventually presented, corroborating the first story woven by Medel.
The story didnt wash, as far as US Magistrate Gregory Hollows was concerned. When Manila had sought the extradition, Strunk was placed under provisional arrest last May 13 and detained at the Sacramento County Jail. With Hollows ruling, Strunk is expected to walk free soon.
What happens now to the two-year-old murder case? Prosecutors still have Medel, who will rot in prison in case enough witnesses are found to testify against him that is, if none of the witnesses recants or follows Strunk and flees to the United States. Thats the greatest risk when crime investigators fail to do their homework and a case hinges on witnesses testimony. This case is lost. With no mastermind and the accused hired killer mentally unstable, the truth about Nida Blancas murder may never be known.
Now the case appears headed for the dustbin of unsolved crimes. The courts rejection is not entirely surprising, considering that the principal witness against Strunk is Philip Medel, a shady character in the same league as scam artist Ador Mawanay. Medel had confessed to the National Bureau of Investigation that he was hired by Strunk to kill the actress. Soon after, Medel was on TV having a convulsive fit, claiming he was tortured into confessing to the crime. The NBI said Medels original testimony remained valid despite his subsequent recantation. Other witnesses were eventually presented, corroborating the first story woven by Medel.
The story didnt wash, as far as US Magistrate Gregory Hollows was concerned. When Manila had sought the extradition, Strunk was placed under provisional arrest last May 13 and detained at the Sacramento County Jail. With Hollows ruling, Strunk is expected to walk free soon.
What happens now to the two-year-old murder case? Prosecutors still have Medel, who will rot in prison in case enough witnesses are found to testify against him that is, if none of the witnesses recants or follows Strunk and flees to the United States. Thats the greatest risk when crime investigators fail to do their homework and a case hinges on witnesses testimony. This case is lost. With no mastermind and the accused hired killer mentally unstable, the truth about Nida Blancas murder may never be known.
BrandSpace Articles
<
>
- Latest
- Trending
Trending
Latest
Trending
Latest
By IMMIGRATION CORNER | By Michael J. Gurfinkel | 1 day ago
By AT GROUND LEVEL | By Satur C. Ocampo | 2 days ago
Recommended