It is in fact the duty of the President to make a clear stand on important public issues, especially one affecting national security.
President Arroyo was not ordering the Senate. She was just giving an opinion. If a columnist, my barber, or a man in the street can express an opinion on the Lacson affair, what more with the Chief Executive?
Having installed her to a position of leadership where she has access to information not available to the rest of us, we expect counsel and guidance from the President. Of course, it is all up to us to listen to her or not.
Separation of powers in theory and practice is not absolute. As we have seen on many instances, there is a sharing of functions, or what we want to call a complementation, among the three branches of government.
Just yesterday, the Commission on Appointments composed of senior senators and congressmen, passed upon some presidential appointees. All these years, nobody has raised the issue of Congress meddling in presidential prerogatives and actions.
Even when a measure is not acted upon by the president in 30 days and it lapses into law, such inaction is actually a form of presidential action, because it moves back the bill to Congress as a new law.
That is how it should be, because we cannot work under a Constitution that would gag the president on such crucial subjects as wholesale robbery, murder, kidnapping, drug-trafficking and money-laundering.
While citizens and taxpayers can raise a howl, the president must keep mum? What would happen to us if we had for a president one of those Senate types whose guiding rule in their public life is ¹No talk, no mistake?
This opinion, the Senate can heed or ignore. We were amused that some senators went out of their way to issue press releases saying that the President was meddling.
We can add the judiciary in our overview of interdepartment ¹meddling and we would see the picture of three co-equal branches of government moving in their respective spheres but continually bumping one another in healthy complementation.
Intels close rival Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) introduced in March last year its Athlon processor, beating Intel in passing the 1-ghz milestone for processors. This time, Intel has grabbed back the lead in the computer chips race.
AMDs fastest Athlon chip runs at 1.4 ghz. Some independent tests have shown, however, that the Athlons beat comparative Pentiums of the same clock speed (meaning a 1.4-ghz Athlon beats a 1.4-ghz Pentium).
As weve been saying here, if youre not in a hurry to get a new PC or to upgrade your present hardware, wait for prices to tumble with the drastic drop in the price of Pentium processors and the stabilizing of the pesos exchange rate.
Many local users have told us that they find no urgent need for the faster and more expensive Pentium 4s. Unless Intel also cuts its Pentium 4 prices, most local users, we think, will stick for a long while to their Pentium 2s and IIIs.
The Pentium 4 chip (just the processor, not the entire PC!) is being sold in New York for $562 each in 1,000-unit quantities. Intel said a chip that runs at 1.9 ghz will be sold for $375.
AKKAP president Josie Dizon-Henson said the affair will be held in cooperation with the AUF (the groups oldest patron), the UP San Fernando on Clark Field whose director Dr. Juliet C. Mallari is the AKKAP board chairman, and the Sinukwan Dance Training Center whose director Peter de Vera is an active member.
Most of the early reactions emailed to us come from the US. Thats partly because while were still sleeping, they are already up and perusing our online edition. Some of them say they go straight to ManilaMail.com and check on Postscript.
We have added, btw, an Archive where past Postscripts can be read without clutter and distraction. A subject Index has also been added to ManilaMail.com for researchers, although, sorry, were still polishing it online.