Col. Victor Corpus, chief of the Intelligence Service of the Armed Forces of the Philippines, has accused Lacson of massive money laundering together with his wife Alice as well as deposed President Joseph Estrada and his wife, Sen. Luisa Ejercito. A newspaper columnist has accused Lacson of worse crimes including multiple murder. Lacson has defended himself in a privilege speech, denying chiefly Corpus’ claims.
If Lacson wants his innocence established conclusively, however, the Senate is not the proper venue. No matter how many privilege speeches he makes, no matter how loud the noise his opposition allies make, only the courts can clear his name. And if he wants to seek redress, he can also sue his detractors.
The government, for its part, should file charges in court if it has enough evidence against Lacson. Public funds financed the sleuthing by ISAFP personnel for Lacson’s purported bank accounts overseas. If the sleuthing unearthed solid evidence, a formal complaint must be filed. Mere prima facie evidence will earn Lacson an indictment and the case can then be tried by a proper court.
In the age of texting and the Internet, it’s so much easier to indict a person in the court of public opinion. Lacson, however, can end up winning in this court if his detractors fail to back their claims with substantial evidence. It’s also easy for the Senate to pounce on every controversy and launch an investigation ostensibly in aid of legislation. But it could merely end up muddling a criminal investigation. It is in the interest of both sides in this controversy to take their case to court – a real one.