LONDON (AFP) - British Prime Minister Gordon Brown will not be "joined together at the hip" with US President George W. Bush, one of Brown's foreign ministers said in an interview published Saturday.
Lord Mark Malloch Brown, newly appointed by Brown as the minister for Africa, Asia and the United Nations, appeared to put fresh strain on London-Washington relations, one day after International Development Secretary Douglas Alexander hinted at a change to transatlantic ties.
And national newspapers mulled over the signs of a more distant partnership and realigned foreign policy under the new prime minister, who took over from Tony Blair on June 27 and has been swift to stake out his own agenda.
Alexander told a Washington audience on Thursday that more emphasis should be placed on "soft power" and multi-lateralism.
Brown then got his chief of staff to write to all cabinet members on Friday to stress the importance of links with the United States -- in what some commentators saw as a damage limitation exercise.
Brown is to meet Bush in Washington within weeks, after talks with French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
Malloch Brown, the United Nations deputy secretary-general from April to December 2006, said Britain needed a more "impartial" foreign policy, forging new links with France, Germany, India and China.
"It is very unlikely that the Brown-Bush relationship is going to go through the baptism of fire and therefore be joined together at the hip like the Blair-Bush relationship was," the Iraq war critic told The Daily Telegraph newsapaper.
"That was a relationship born out of being war leaders together. There was an emotional intensity of being war leaders with much of the world against them. That is enough to put you on your knees and get you praying together."
London needs to broaden its international partnerships beyond the "special relationship" with Washington, Malloch Brown said.
"You need to build coaltions that are lateral, which go beyond the bilateral blinkers of the normal partners. My hope is that foreign policy will become much more impartial.
"We have a whole set of emerging countries. There will be lots of exciting things to do with Sarkozy and Merkel and other European leaders as well as strengthening transatlantic relations."
He added: "What I really hate is the effort to paint me as anti-American, but I am happy to be described as an anti-neo-con."
He said Washington would find Brown a "sympathetic prime minister who wants a strong relationship."
In its editorial, The Daily Telegraph slammed Malloch Brown for his "self-importance" and said the prime minister "must not allow his bien pensant namesake to sow suspicion in Washington."
It was not the only newspaper attempting to make sense of Alexander's speech and Brown's response.
The Independent newspaper said Alexander's speech was "an impressive break with the past.
"It seems highly unlikely that Mr Brown will be the uncritical ally of the United States president that his predecessor was."
The Guardian newspaper said a "grenade had been tossed" with Alexander's speech and the appointment of Malloch Brown showed Brown intended to "rebalance Britain's foreign policy objectives" in a subtle shift.
"Steady, Gordon," warned The Sun newspaper, reminding Brown that the United States was Britain's "greatest ally" and he had a duty to protect the so-called special relationship.
The tabloid also blasted his "appalling decision" to appoint Malloch Brown, "a man who delighted in savaging America in his last job at the UN and who has no place in the British government."