SC junks poll protest vs Laguna governor
October 11, 2006 | 12:00am
The Supreme Court (SC) junked yesterday the electoral protest filed by movie actor Danilo "Dan" Fernandez against Laguna Gov. Teresita Lazaro.
In a 10-page decision penned by Associate Justice Consuelo Ynares-Santiago, the SC upheld the Commission on Elections (Comelec) en banc resolution issued last March 9, affirming the proclamation of Lazaro as governor of Laguna.
The SC said the Comelec did not commit grave abuse of discretion when it upheld the legality of Lazaros proclamation as the winner in the 2004 gubernatorial race.
During the canvassing of the certificates of canvass by the provincial board of canvassers (PBOC), Fernandez moved to suspend the proceedings, claiming that election returns from San Pablo City and Biñan had been tampered, thus increasing Lazaros votes.
The PBOC denied Fernandezs motion, saying the issue should have been raised before the city and municipal boards of canvassers.
This prompted Fernandez to file a petition with the Comelecs first division seeking to annul Lazaros proclamation.
The SC, however, said the Comelecs first division correctly held that Fernandez did not comply with the mandatory requirements to submit his oral objections to the chairman of the board of canvassers at the time the questioned certificates were presented for inclusion in the canvass.
It added that Fernandez did not question the election returns before the appropriate city and municipal boards of canvassers, as mandated.
In fact, he also belatedly questioned the election returns from Calamba City and four other municipalities.
"The fact that the Comelecs first division ordered the examination of election returns notwithstanding petitioners (Fernandezs) belated objections thereto would not change the outcome of this case," the SC said.
In a 10-page decision penned by Associate Justice Consuelo Ynares-Santiago, the SC upheld the Commission on Elections (Comelec) en banc resolution issued last March 9, affirming the proclamation of Lazaro as governor of Laguna.
The SC said the Comelec did not commit grave abuse of discretion when it upheld the legality of Lazaros proclamation as the winner in the 2004 gubernatorial race.
During the canvassing of the certificates of canvass by the provincial board of canvassers (PBOC), Fernandez moved to suspend the proceedings, claiming that election returns from San Pablo City and Biñan had been tampered, thus increasing Lazaros votes.
The PBOC denied Fernandezs motion, saying the issue should have been raised before the city and municipal boards of canvassers.
This prompted Fernandez to file a petition with the Comelecs first division seeking to annul Lazaros proclamation.
The SC, however, said the Comelecs first division correctly held that Fernandez did not comply with the mandatory requirements to submit his oral objections to the chairman of the board of canvassers at the time the questioned certificates were presented for inclusion in the canvass.
It added that Fernandez did not question the election returns before the appropriate city and municipal boards of canvassers, as mandated.
In fact, he also belatedly questioned the election returns from Calamba City and four other municipalities.
"The fact that the Comelecs first division ordered the examination of election returns notwithstanding petitioners (Fernandezs) belated objections thereto would not change the outcome of this case," the SC said.
BrandSpace Articles
<
>
- Latest
- Trending
Trending
Latest
Trending
Latest
Recommended