Hail the glass teat
February 2, 2007 | 12:00am
![](./main/20070202/images/lif5.jpg)
(Honestly, who would watch scholarly and earn-estly made films like The Nativity over admittedly dubious pseudo-historical fluff like The Da Vinci Code? Certainly not me. Id only be interested if Mel Gibson were directing.)
Weve been told repeatedly that images of violence and sex corrupt the viewer. Although my watching of pornography is moderate (but respectable), Ill admit to having a predilection for gore and extreme imagery. The more disrespectable, the more over-the-top, the better. Just this past week, Ive popped in the DVD player pirated copies of Cannibal Holocaust, Nekromantik and some Dario Argento, skipping to the tasty parts just to get my fix. I abhor the TV show CSI because the vertiginous visual style makes it hard to discern any details on the bodies; on the other hand, I try to catch the police/crime segments on the local news whenever I can. That is always fascinating. As opposed to Jerry Bruckheimers big budgets and NYU film school talents, all you really need to get compelling television is a strong stomach.
Actually, the only Shakespeare that I really like nowadays and not just say that I do is Macbeth. But Id rather watch the Roman Polanski film version than Akira Kurosawas. (I wouldnt even bother watching a stage version.)
How can I watch such depravity and not be depraved myself? The answer is the quote above. I dont believe any of it but I accept it. If I may be so bold, nothing you see, hear or read is true. There might be some truth in it but not one gives you the whole picture. While Im writing this, theres a short promo about the popular violinist Vanessa Mae and her extraordinary story. Theres no mention of her talent for playing the violin but by the way its presented its seems likely that shes quite good. But no, shes awful. Try listening to her taking on Paganini on one of her albums and tell me that Im wrong. However, I accept that she is a celebrity but really, exactly what is that?
When I watch violence, I accept it as part of a show even if its real. There must be some thought given to the ratings whenever they edit news footage. Im perfectly willing to accept that. But I dont believe that what Im seeing is anywhere near what actually transpired. Again, how can I? Its TV.
However, Ill admit that this attitude serves as a defense mechanism, a filter. I think everybody should adopt it. Of course, the best thing would be to stop watching but I cant and dont want to.
TV is important as vital to modern man as reading a book. During my interview with Lizza Nakpil, she said she watches ads mostly, not shows. According to the Rivermaya manager, she can feel the pulse and sudden shifts of the times by watching those commercials. If one wants to know what people are thinking, its the most sensitive and accurate barometer of the current social climate. Thats wisdom they never teach us in textbooks.
But put that aside, and you still have something that couldnt have worked in any other medium: The Tyra Banks Show. I watch that every day if I can. It is in accord with one of my long-held beliefs about TV: its like junk food its best when its bad for you.
For our contest, here are some interesting proposals for Jamie and Adam to take on:
"Can you really choke on your own vomit?" submitted by Fred Santos, musician.
"Is it possible to have your head spin around like Linda Blair (in The Exorcist)?" submitted by Von Ng, painter/businessman.
"Does hair really grow on your palms if you abuse yourself too much?" submitted by Jason Tan.
BrandSpace Articles
<
>