After a failed marriage, I developed a fear of trusting any man. But along the way, I healed, and with my spirits almost restored (one cant really totally be restored after a betrayal), I moved on and was able to accept and give love again. But every now and then, the experience of losing trust in friends, in our government, and business relationships recur in the everyday humdrum of living, which disillusions me. But life goes on, with or without trust, and after reading an article called "In Trust We Trust," I overcame my fear of trusting others.
When we trust, we have a confident dependence on the character, ability, strength, or truth of someone or something. We rely on that someone for a future action. Lovers commit to each other and trust in each others fidelity, a bank client relies on his bank to make his money grow, an employee relies on his company for his livelihood. From this perspective, trust is a contingent emotional feeling, highly conditional in nature and subject to reappraisal.
While Buddha and other spiritual teachers did not reject this conditional view, they also understood trust as a means of finding freedom from the endless cycles of fear and want. There are three kinds of trust:
1) Transactional trust, which occurs in our daily life. In the workplace, it translates as management trusting employees and vice versa; in relationships, it means sharing intimacy. In friendship, mutual respect. Transactional trust is based on the assumption that trust will continue in the future. It is a time-centric, emotional view of the past and future, largely performance-based, it involves an agreed-upon exchange, and is measured by the outcome.
By definition, transactional trust brings to mind the experience of a family member with one of the prestigious banks in Manila. Upon the recommendation of one of the banks top-level executives, he invested millions of hard-earned pesos in a project that the bank had with a "reputable" big-time real estate developer-turned-politician. The "reputable" developer-turned politician defaulted on the investors and, in short, lots were paid in place of the investment. But the lots value did not measure up to the investors money. Instead of getting zilch for his money, he had no choice but to accept the unjust terms of the exchange. Do you think this politician is to be trusted? With politicians like him, no wonder our country is in the state it is now. I hear a lot of horror stories that defy the principles of transactional trust. Like that of a friend, a foreign lady whose rental deposit was not returned by her landlord. It turns out that her landlord has a bad reputation in this posh Makati Village for his unfair practice of not returning his lessees security deposit. She will leave our country with the idea that Filipinos are a dishonest breed because of her dishonest landlord.
2) "Innate trust" is the understanding that external conditions are in the end not a reliable source of happiness or meaning because they are always changing. You dont get what you want, or you get it and then lose it, or you no longer want it, or else something happens and you can no longer enjoy it. Innate trust accepts the hard fact of life that things are always changing, the future is uncertain, and wants and fears are endless.
With innate trust, one gains strength of mind and objectivity and freedom. It is not the same as transactional trust. If, for example, you were cheated by your boss, you will not allow it to ruin your life. It is a moment of unpleasantness that you have to deal with. But it does not mean transactional trust is irrelevant because you will need it to function in daily life. But as you mature, what matters now is how you face lifes broader challenges. While you certainly dont want to be betrayed by a lover or a friend or let down by a boss, what really matters is what you are inside.
3) Another kind of trust, which is often a hindrance to developing innate trust, is "demand or false trust." It is illustrated in the words "I trust you to meet my needs." Or "I trust you not to change," or "I trust you not to betray me." Demand trust is a form of aggression and attributable to either excessive fear, insecurity, or trickery and manipulation. What makes this form of trust so damaging is that it can undermine the possibility of innate trust. However, once recognized for what it is, you can lessen its impact by either removing yourself from the situation or by insisting on a transactional discussion.
As Walter Anderson once said, " Were never so vulnerable than when we trust someone, but paradoxically, if we cannot trust, neither can we find love or joy." And since love is the joy of life, trust whether transactional, innate or the demand kind is so vital in our daily lives.