Doing a Weldon
October 1, 2001 | 12:00am
Lost in the rash of the past two weeks bad news was a juicyor should I say glitterytidbit from the often staid and gray world of publishing. British novelist Fay Weldonthe author of more than 20 books including The Life and Loves of a She-Devil, which starred Meryl Streep in the film versioncame out with a new novel called The Bulgari Connection.
As controversial as the New Zealand-born Ms. Weldon has been for her views on rape, men, and feminism, what guaranteed her new book instant celebrity (or notoriety) was the fact that it had been specially commissioned by Bulgari, the jewelry company, who paid Weldon an undisclosed amount for the privilege of having "Bulgari" mentioned at least a dozen times in the novel. Weldon did more than that: she focused the whole book on Bulgari, dropping the name more than three dozen times in a tale of love, sex, and pricey baubles that Weldons agent, with understandable overstatement, likened to the oeuvre of F. Scott Fitzgerald.
Predictably, a ton of opaque rocks descended on Weldons head when the news of her "literary prostitution" reached the press. Aside from "prostitution," words like "sellout," "compromise" and "crass commercialism" hounded the author.
That amuses the 69-year-old Weldon who, the Guardian reports, had some initial doubts: "When the approach came through I thought, oh no, dear me, I am a literary author. You cant do this kind of thing; my name will be mud forever. But after a while I thought, I dont care. Let it be mud. They never give me the Booker Prize anyway." (Shes no third-rate hack, having been nominated for the BookerBritains top book awardin 1979.)
The novel had originally been meant to be a kind of party favor for private distribution by Bulgari, but HarperCollins has undertaken to produce a popular edition. "Just explain to me," Weldon asks, "why it is more contemptible to be paid by an Italian jewelry firm than by HarperCollins? Its still money."
So whats wrong with that? Plenty, if you go by the thinking of some poobahsnot likely working writers themselveswho insist on treating writing as some kind of holy ritual to be divorced from all monetary considerations (and these people, of course, never paid a priest to bless their boutiques or to offer Mass). Artists can make money painting society portraits, musicians can make money doing soap-bar jingles, James Bond can make money flashing an Ericsson, even athletes can make money wearing fastfood logos on their foreheads, but writers arent supposed to make money using certain proper nouns.
There should only be one test of Fay Weldons Bulgari novel, as shamelessly commercial as its premises may be: does it work? Does it read well? Do we mind or remember, in the end, that she got a bonus from a sponsor for saying "Bulgari" instead of, say, "Cartier"?
I myself was more than miffed a couple of years ago when a family biography Id worked on for over two years failed to even make it to the shortlist of the National Book Awards. Now, I certainly dont expect a prize for every book or story I writeLord knows Ive laid some nasty cow pies in that pasture we call literaturebut writers whove been writing long enough develop what Hemingway called, pardon Ernests language, a "bullshit meter" to tell them if theyve written something good or crappy. (If you dont have this BSM and just listen to all the honeyed citations at awards ceremonies, youll soon be in trouble.) I thought that the biography Id written wasnt earthshaking or anything like that, and the book itself was on the thin side at just less than 200 pages; but on the other hand, it broke new ground, it told an important story, and it offered a satisfying read to those who took the trouble to leaf through its pages.
Frankly I wasnt surprised that it didnt win, considering the caliber of the competition; but I was dismayed to learn (only recently, as a matter of fact) that it wasnt even considered for the shortlist allegedly because I had noted, on the back cover itself, that I had been commissioned by the family to write the book. In other words, I had been paid to write someones story.
I couldve accepted a qualified critics opinion, if one had been expressed, that the book was badly researched and poorly written. But I thought it strange to have been disqualifiedif indeed my book wason account of my admission that it was a commissioned work. Somebody please tell me whats wrong with being forthright about a fact that many other authors would rather sweep under the rug. (One critic-editor I know, a fairly successful fellow himself except for a sad deficiency in what every good writer and editor needsaccuracy, good taste, and what we usually call "a life" as in "Get a life!"even had the nerve to screech at a public forum that "If I were commissioned to write a book, Id never acknowledge it!")
Even the Olympics have gotten over the hypocrisy of sham amateurism, and to suggest that a work is any less good or any less honest because it had been paid for would leave literature and publishing to those with the privilege and leisure to dabble in them when they so please. Nobody but the hiring party winces if Nick Joaquin charges three to five million sweet yams for a bookand hes my hero in this departmentbut then again, thats Nick Joaquin.
As Ive said before, I make a living off my writing, though several barangays away from Mr. Joaquins neighborhood, and Im just thankful I can in these parlous times. I do make a clear distinction between the work I do for others and which might go under someone elses bylinespeeches and corporate reports, for exampleand the work I do for myself, which goes under my name and which I will personally stand by. If I get paid for my byline (and all the effort that goes into producing the book), then that means that I have written that work as if it were my ownexcept that I could not or might not have done it on my own time.
But then of course, I know that other commissioned (albeit unacknowledged) works have won book awards, so perhaps the only other explanation is right, after all: the book just wasnt good enough. If so, I can live with that and move on to my next project. After four National Book Awards and a share of a fifth, Im sure I can survive my middle age without seeing another one.
It just worries me that I must be running really low these days on luck and talentanother book I edited, Under the Crescent Moon, written by the outstanding journalists Marites Vitug and Glenda Gloria, also failed to make it to this years National Book Awards shortlist, despite its painstaking research, its insightful reportage, and its sheer usefulness as a much-quoted resource in these dark days of global terror and the Abu Sayyaf. Curiously enough, that same abovementioned critic had thumbed this book down as soon as it came out for being "badly edited," without saying exactly where and how. Was he on the screening committee? I dare not ask.
Lets go back to something funnier. Theres a website called the Modern Humorist (www.modernhumorist.com) where the Weldon-Bulgari tie-up had the wags wondering how other authors might have done their own versions of the textual plug:
Stephen King: "The blood flowed thick and red, staining the royal blue carpet under her feet to create a viscous purpleat least, thats the way the crisp colors looked with Kodaks Advanced Photo System technology."
JK Rowling: "Harry knew that Quidditch would never be the same after trading in his dusty broom for a revolutionary new Swiffer."
Phillip Roth: "Portnoy stared long and hard into the cartoon eyes of the little redheaded mascot, but his eyes nearly popped out when he saw his large Wendys Frosty; not only did it look delicious, it was so soft and moist..."
Salman Rushdie: "On St. Valentines Day, 1989, the last day of her life, the legendary popular singer Vina Apsara woke sobbing from a dream in which, somehow, at the stroke of midnight, every Tucks Hemorrhoidal Towelette with Witch Hazel disappeared all at once."
William Jefferson Clinton: "Its amazing that during this difficult period of my presidency, with Mr. Starrs team scouring all White House records, no one thought to examine the images I had recorded with my X10 Webcam. Its tiny and wireless!"
And heres mine: "I come from a country without snow and Macintosh PowerBook 2400cs. Instead we have coconuts and cheap translucent rip-offs of the Graphite iMac Special Edition." I dont suppose Steve Jobs is going to gift me with a new Titanium G4 PowerBook for the favor, will he now?
Send e-mail to Butch Dalisay at penmanila@yahoo.com.
As controversial as the New Zealand-born Ms. Weldon has been for her views on rape, men, and feminism, what guaranteed her new book instant celebrity (or notoriety) was the fact that it had been specially commissioned by Bulgari, the jewelry company, who paid Weldon an undisclosed amount for the privilege of having "Bulgari" mentioned at least a dozen times in the novel. Weldon did more than that: she focused the whole book on Bulgari, dropping the name more than three dozen times in a tale of love, sex, and pricey baubles that Weldons agent, with understandable overstatement, likened to the oeuvre of F. Scott Fitzgerald.
Predictably, a ton of opaque rocks descended on Weldons head when the news of her "literary prostitution" reached the press. Aside from "prostitution," words like "sellout," "compromise" and "crass commercialism" hounded the author.
That amuses the 69-year-old Weldon who, the Guardian reports, had some initial doubts: "When the approach came through I thought, oh no, dear me, I am a literary author. You cant do this kind of thing; my name will be mud forever. But after a while I thought, I dont care. Let it be mud. They never give me the Booker Prize anyway." (Shes no third-rate hack, having been nominated for the BookerBritains top book awardin 1979.)
The novel had originally been meant to be a kind of party favor for private distribution by Bulgari, but HarperCollins has undertaken to produce a popular edition. "Just explain to me," Weldon asks, "why it is more contemptible to be paid by an Italian jewelry firm than by HarperCollins? Its still money."
So whats wrong with that? Plenty, if you go by the thinking of some poobahsnot likely working writers themselveswho insist on treating writing as some kind of holy ritual to be divorced from all monetary considerations (and these people, of course, never paid a priest to bless their boutiques or to offer Mass). Artists can make money painting society portraits, musicians can make money doing soap-bar jingles, James Bond can make money flashing an Ericsson, even athletes can make money wearing fastfood logos on their foreheads, but writers arent supposed to make money using certain proper nouns.
There should only be one test of Fay Weldons Bulgari novel, as shamelessly commercial as its premises may be: does it work? Does it read well? Do we mind or remember, in the end, that she got a bonus from a sponsor for saying "Bulgari" instead of, say, "Cartier"?
I myself was more than miffed a couple of years ago when a family biography Id worked on for over two years failed to even make it to the shortlist of the National Book Awards. Now, I certainly dont expect a prize for every book or story I writeLord knows Ive laid some nasty cow pies in that pasture we call literaturebut writers whove been writing long enough develop what Hemingway called, pardon Ernests language, a "bullshit meter" to tell them if theyve written something good or crappy. (If you dont have this BSM and just listen to all the honeyed citations at awards ceremonies, youll soon be in trouble.) I thought that the biography Id written wasnt earthshaking or anything like that, and the book itself was on the thin side at just less than 200 pages; but on the other hand, it broke new ground, it told an important story, and it offered a satisfying read to those who took the trouble to leaf through its pages.
Frankly I wasnt surprised that it didnt win, considering the caliber of the competition; but I was dismayed to learn (only recently, as a matter of fact) that it wasnt even considered for the shortlist allegedly because I had noted, on the back cover itself, that I had been commissioned by the family to write the book. In other words, I had been paid to write someones story.
I couldve accepted a qualified critics opinion, if one had been expressed, that the book was badly researched and poorly written. But I thought it strange to have been disqualifiedif indeed my book wason account of my admission that it was a commissioned work. Somebody please tell me whats wrong with being forthright about a fact that many other authors would rather sweep under the rug. (One critic-editor I know, a fairly successful fellow himself except for a sad deficiency in what every good writer and editor needsaccuracy, good taste, and what we usually call "a life" as in "Get a life!"even had the nerve to screech at a public forum that "If I were commissioned to write a book, Id never acknowledge it!")
Even the Olympics have gotten over the hypocrisy of sham amateurism, and to suggest that a work is any less good or any less honest because it had been paid for would leave literature and publishing to those with the privilege and leisure to dabble in them when they so please. Nobody but the hiring party winces if Nick Joaquin charges three to five million sweet yams for a bookand hes my hero in this departmentbut then again, thats Nick Joaquin.
As Ive said before, I make a living off my writing, though several barangays away from Mr. Joaquins neighborhood, and Im just thankful I can in these parlous times. I do make a clear distinction between the work I do for others and which might go under someone elses bylinespeeches and corporate reports, for exampleand the work I do for myself, which goes under my name and which I will personally stand by. If I get paid for my byline (and all the effort that goes into producing the book), then that means that I have written that work as if it were my ownexcept that I could not or might not have done it on my own time.
But then of course, I know that other commissioned (albeit unacknowledged) works have won book awards, so perhaps the only other explanation is right, after all: the book just wasnt good enough. If so, I can live with that and move on to my next project. After four National Book Awards and a share of a fifth, Im sure I can survive my middle age without seeing another one.
It just worries me that I must be running really low these days on luck and talentanother book I edited, Under the Crescent Moon, written by the outstanding journalists Marites Vitug and Glenda Gloria, also failed to make it to this years National Book Awards shortlist, despite its painstaking research, its insightful reportage, and its sheer usefulness as a much-quoted resource in these dark days of global terror and the Abu Sayyaf. Curiously enough, that same abovementioned critic had thumbed this book down as soon as it came out for being "badly edited," without saying exactly where and how. Was he on the screening committee? I dare not ask.
Lets go back to something funnier. Theres a website called the Modern Humorist (www.modernhumorist.com) where the Weldon-Bulgari tie-up had the wags wondering how other authors might have done their own versions of the textual plug:
Stephen King: "The blood flowed thick and red, staining the royal blue carpet under her feet to create a viscous purpleat least, thats the way the crisp colors looked with Kodaks Advanced Photo System technology."
JK Rowling: "Harry knew that Quidditch would never be the same after trading in his dusty broom for a revolutionary new Swiffer."
Phillip Roth: "Portnoy stared long and hard into the cartoon eyes of the little redheaded mascot, but his eyes nearly popped out when he saw his large Wendys Frosty; not only did it look delicious, it was so soft and moist..."
Salman Rushdie: "On St. Valentines Day, 1989, the last day of her life, the legendary popular singer Vina Apsara woke sobbing from a dream in which, somehow, at the stroke of midnight, every Tucks Hemorrhoidal Towelette with Witch Hazel disappeared all at once."
William Jefferson Clinton: "Its amazing that during this difficult period of my presidency, with Mr. Starrs team scouring all White House records, no one thought to examine the images I had recorded with my X10 Webcam. Its tiny and wireless!"
And heres mine: "I come from a country without snow and Macintosh PowerBook 2400cs. Instead we have coconuts and cheap translucent rip-offs of the Graphite iMac Special Edition." I dont suppose Steve Jobs is going to gift me with a new Titanium G4 PowerBook for the favor, will he now?
BrandSpace Articles
<
>