Court to hear DOJ appeal of dismissal of drug case vs Ongpin next week

File photo shows Julian Ongpin.
The STAR / File

MANILA, Philippines — The La Union court is set to hear next week the appeal filed by state prosecutors to reverse the dismissal of drug charge against Julian Ongpin, son of tycoon Roberto, Prosecutor General Benedicto Malcontento said.

Malcontento told reporters that state prosecutors filed the motion for reconsideration on Thursday, November 25. A hearing has been set on December 3.

“If allowed by the court, the panel will present evidence in support of the motion for reconsideration,” Malcontento added.

A copy of the motion for reconsideration filed by the DOJ has yet to be made public.

La Union Regional Trial Court Branch 27 Presiding Judge Romeo Agacita Jr. on November 15 dismissed the possession of illegal drugs charge filed against Ongpin, “after an independent assessment of the evidence on record… and supporting evidence.”

The court also ordered the lifting of the precautionary hold departure order against Ongpin.

The judge said it the court was constrained to dismiss the case "for lack of probable cause to issue warrant of arrest against [Ongpin], in view of utter non-compliance of the requirements of Sec. 21 of [Republic Act 9165]."

Section 21 defines Custody and Disposition of Confiscated, Seized and/or Surrendered Dangerous Drugs, Plant Sources of Dangerous Drugs, Controlled Precursors and Essential Chemicals, Instruments/Paraphernalia and/or Laboratory Equipment.

Chain of custody rule

In the case against Ongpin, authorities who were investigating the death of his companion Bree Jonson allegedly found more than 12 grams of cocaine in the room they shared.

But the court pointed that said the arresting officers did not give justifiable ground for the absence of witnesses and did not exert earnest efforts to reach barangay officers, which were stated in Section 21 of RA 9165.

"The repeated breach of the chain of custody rule here had cast serious uncertainty on the identity and integrity of the corpus delicti [body of the crime]. Verily, invocation of the saving clause is unwarranted," the ruling read.

Ongpin is also a person of interest in the ongoing investigation of Jonson’s death. — Kristine Joy Patag

Show comments