Withdraw gag order plea vs ABS-CBN, Amnesty International says

Employees of local broadcast giant ABS-CBN holding placards ask motorists to hink their cars during a protest in front of ABS-CBN building in Manila on February 14, 2020. Philippine government lawyers moved on February 10 to strip the nation's biggest media group of its operating franchise in what campaigners branded a fresh attack on press freedom under President Rodrigo Duterte.
AFP/Ted Aljibe

MANILA, Philippines — An international human rights watchdog called for the withdrawal of Solicitor General Jose Calida’s “reprehensible” motion for

the issuance of gag order on the government’s petition for the revocation of franchise of network ABS-CBN.

Amnesty International Regional Director Nicholas

Bequelin said that the gag order, “a clear attempt to silence critics,” will set a “very dangerous precedent in violation of the right to freedom of expression.”

In a release Tuesday night,

Bequelin called the gag order plea filed by Philippine government’s chief lawyer a request “to prevent people from freely discussing issues of public interest such as media freedom, and ongoing human rights violations in the country.”

Calida filed a Very Urgent Motion for

the Issuance of Gag Order Tuesday morning, the same day that the Supreme Court justices meet for a full court session.

He accused the network, whose franchise ending in a month and he wanted revoked, of engaging in “propaganda in clear attempt to elicit public sympathy, sway public opinion, and, ultimately influence the resolution of the case.”

Calida listed explainers and reports of the network’s journalists on his

quo

warranto petition, “commentaries” of ABS-CBN and posts by its talents and other personalities as “instances” where the broadcast company violated the sub judice rule.

The sub judice rule

is defined by jurisprudence

as a rule that “restricts comments and disclosures pertaining to judicial proceedings to avoid prejudging the issue, influencing the court, or obstructing the administration of justice.”

Amnesty International’s

Bequelin slammed Calida’s motion and said that “it is unacceptable for the authorities

to blatantly attempt to restrict freedom of expression and then expect people in the Philippines

to simply remain silent.”

He said that it would be better for the Philippine government to listen and address the criticism it has been receiving instead of “resorting to legal theatrics to suppress human rights.”

Calida's

quo

warranto vs ABS-CBN franchise

With a little over a month to renew its legislative franchise, Calida filed a

quo

warranto petition against ABS-CBN Corp. and asked the SC to revoke its franchise on February 11.

In a statement on the filing, Calida said: “We want to put an end to what we discovered to be highly abusive practices of ABS-CBN benefitting a greedy few at the expense of millions of its loyal subscribers. These practices have gone unnoticed or

were disregarded for years.”

ABS-CBN is

due to file its comment on Calida’s

quo

warranto petition on February 24.

Show comments