US military finds model for beating terrorism in RP
May 28, 2006 | 12:00am
HONOLULU (AP) When US Army Col. James Linder talks about battles won in the war on terror, he doesnt list enemies killed and targets destroyed.
Instead, the commander of US Special Forces in the Philippines recounts jobs created and schools built.
"We just changed the dynamics of a very small community," Linder said, "from one in which only a few years ago, Abu Sayyaf was coming down from the hilltop with weapons on their back and recruiting the school children, to one in which they cant come there anymore."
Since 2002, US Army Rangers and Navy SEALs have been training and equipping Philippine troops to oust al-Qaeda-linked Abu Sayyaf terrorists from Mindanao, a predominantly Muslim and largely poor part of the Southeast Asian nation. The militaries have used a combination of combat offensives and development projects with a heavy emphasis on the latter to isolate the terrorists and win over local populations.
Their successes in villages like the one Linder described contrast sharply with the US-led effort in Iraq or Afghanistan, where terror attacks only seem to increase. And now, senior US military leaders say their work in the Philippines may offer lessons for how the US operates in the Middle East.
To be sure, circumstances in the Philippines are far different from Iraq or Afghanistan. Disparate cultures, history and geography would prevent any Philippine solution from being applied directly to either country.
US troops also do not themselves participate in combat in the Philippines. The US military initially wanted to fight but President Arroyos shaky administration refused to gamble with the politically explosive prospect of foreign troops fighting domestic insurgents on Philippine soil.
Further, the US and Philippine militaries cannot take credit for all of Abu Sayyafs failures. The group has marginalized itself by offending local populations with the use of tactics like beheadings, rape and torture.
But Linder, speaking on the sidelines of an anti-terror conference in Hawaii, said his interactions with people on the island of Jolo, Sulu show the troops are making a difference.
He recalls the visibly emotional woman who ran up to him because she wanted to show her gratitude for the sewing machine that has allowed her to earn a living. And the village leader who vowed to quit fighting for Abu Sayyaf and instead take up arms alongside Filipino soldiers against his former allies.
On Basilan island, where US troops first started operating four years ago, improved security has allowed the Philippine military to shrink its presence from 15 battalions to two, said Maj. Gen. David Fridovich, the commander of US Special Forces in the Pacific.
Fridovich said military operations are only 15 percent of what needs to be done. The rest is humanitarian, like Army engineers helping rebuild schools and military doctors giving residents shots.
US aid workers have helped build bridges and roads.
"We think there is a model here thats worth showcasing. Theres another way of doing business," Fridovich told reporters at the Pacific Area Special Operations Conference in Honolulu last month.
"Weve been doing it for four years with some decent results. Not grand results, not flashy results, but some decent results. We think its worthwhile."
Rohan Gunaratna, head of terrorism research at the Singapore-based Institute of Defense and Strategic Studies, said the US has had "tremendous success" on Basilan. He added every American soldier should study what has happened there.
"The Americans did not take the shortcut in Basilan. They took the long road thats working with civilians. Their priority was to build bridges with the Muslim public rather than hunt the terrorists," Gunaratna said.
Iraq only became so violent because US commanders focused too much energy on killing enemies when they should have done more to meet the basic needs of Iraqis, he said.
"The terrorists are also competing for the hearts and the minds of the people," Gunaratna said. "If you are able to do a better job, the terrorists are marginalized. No one will support the terrorists."
The US military effort in the Philippines has not been easy.
Nearly a dozen American troops died in a helicopter crash and a bomb attack in 2002. Muslim activists and residents have protested the US presence, calling it a magnet for violence and a violation of Philippine sovereignty.
A few hundred mountain-based guerrillas continue to threaten Jolo. In March, suspected Abu Sayyaf members bombed a grocery store on the southern island, killing nine people.
Washington and Manila, meanwhile, are deepening their partnership. On Wednesday, the two nations announced a new security arrangement expanding the grounds for American forces to stage exercises in the Philippines.
When asked if the Basilan experience was applicable to Iraq and Afghanistan, Gen. Bryan D. Brown, head of US Special Operations Command, said every culture and situation was different, but many lessons could be learned.
"Its about working with the people, its about building the infrastructure, its about demonstrating good governance," Brown told reporters at the Hawaii conference. "Its about good medical care, its about eliminating human suffering."
Instead, the commander of US Special Forces in the Philippines recounts jobs created and schools built.
"We just changed the dynamics of a very small community," Linder said, "from one in which only a few years ago, Abu Sayyaf was coming down from the hilltop with weapons on their back and recruiting the school children, to one in which they cant come there anymore."
Since 2002, US Army Rangers and Navy SEALs have been training and equipping Philippine troops to oust al-Qaeda-linked Abu Sayyaf terrorists from Mindanao, a predominantly Muslim and largely poor part of the Southeast Asian nation. The militaries have used a combination of combat offensives and development projects with a heavy emphasis on the latter to isolate the terrorists and win over local populations.
Their successes in villages like the one Linder described contrast sharply with the US-led effort in Iraq or Afghanistan, where terror attacks only seem to increase. And now, senior US military leaders say their work in the Philippines may offer lessons for how the US operates in the Middle East.
To be sure, circumstances in the Philippines are far different from Iraq or Afghanistan. Disparate cultures, history and geography would prevent any Philippine solution from being applied directly to either country.
US troops also do not themselves participate in combat in the Philippines. The US military initially wanted to fight but President Arroyos shaky administration refused to gamble with the politically explosive prospect of foreign troops fighting domestic insurgents on Philippine soil.
Further, the US and Philippine militaries cannot take credit for all of Abu Sayyafs failures. The group has marginalized itself by offending local populations with the use of tactics like beheadings, rape and torture.
But Linder, speaking on the sidelines of an anti-terror conference in Hawaii, said his interactions with people on the island of Jolo, Sulu show the troops are making a difference.
He recalls the visibly emotional woman who ran up to him because she wanted to show her gratitude for the sewing machine that has allowed her to earn a living. And the village leader who vowed to quit fighting for Abu Sayyaf and instead take up arms alongside Filipino soldiers against his former allies.
On Basilan island, where US troops first started operating four years ago, improved security has allowed the Philippine military to shrink its presence from 15 battalions to two, said Maj. Gen. David Fridovich, the commander of US Special Forces in the Pacific.
Fridovich said military operations are only 15 percent of what needs to be done. The rest is humanitarian, like Army engineers helping rebuild schools and military doctors giving residents shots.
US aid workers have helped build bridges and roads.
"We think there is a model here thats worth showcasing. Theres another way of doing business," Fridovich told reporters at the Pacific Area Special Operations Conference in Honolulu last month.
"Weve been doing it for four years with some decent results. Not grand results, not flashy results, but some decent results. We think its worthwhile."
Rohan Gunaratna, head of terrorism research at the Singapore-based Institute of Defense and Strategic Studies, said the US has had "tremendous success" on Basilan. He added every American soldier should study what has happened there.
"The Americans did not take the shortcut in Basilan. They took the long road thats working with civilians. Their priority was to build bridges with the Muslim public rather than hunt the terrorists," Gunaratna said.
Iraq only became so violent because US commanders focused too much energy on killing enemies when they should have done more to meet the basic needs of Iraqis, he said.
"The terrorists are also competing for the hearts and the minds of the people," Gunaratna said. "If you are able to do a better job, the terrorists are marginalized. No one will support the terrorists."
The US military effort in the Philippines has not been easy.
Nearly a dozen American troops died in a helicopter crash and a bomb attack in 2002. Muslim activists and residents have protested the US presence, calling it a magnet for violence and a violation of Philippine sovereignty.
A few hundred mountain-based guerrillas continue to threaten Jolo. In March, suspected Abu Sayyaf members bombed a grocery store on the southern island, killing nine people.
Washington and Manila, meanwhile, are deepening their partnership. On Wednesday, the two nations announced a new security arrangement expanding the grounds for American forces to stage exercises in the Philippines.
When asked if the Basilan experience was applicable to Iraq and Afghanistan, Gen. Bryan D. Brown, head of US Special Operations Command, said every culture and situation was different, but many lessons could be learned.
"Its about working with the people, its about building the infrastructure, its about demonstrating good governance," Brown told reporters at the Hawaii conference. "Its about good medical care, its about eliminating human suffering."
BrandSpace Articles
<
>
- Latest
- Trending
Trending
Latest
Trending
Latest
Recommended