So now we talk of "shifting gears", "getting into high gear", or "in top gear". Or refer to a "cog in the machine". Question is, without gears does it remain a machine? What to make of CVT-equipped cars then?
Hondas latest entry-level baby, the City, is one such car that offers this feature called the CVT, or Continuously Variable Transmission. While CVT did not exist during the time of drunk Greek philosophers, it has been around for quite some time now, having reportedly been invented by Dutch firm Van Doorne decades ago. Incidentally, Honda tapped Van Doorne when it was developing its own take on CVT.
The early versions of CVT werent practical nor reliable, incapable of being matched with engines that has high horsepower or torque ratings. Worse, reviews of CVT-eqipped production vehicles from as recent as five years back werent favorable, the critics were unanimous in saying that it reminded them too much of a slipping clutch. If you drive with a conventional manual transmission, youd know how irksome that can be. But with current advances in gee-whiz computerized engine management wizardry, CVTs, like those on the City, are proving to be feasible alternative transmission systems.
But what exactly is a CVT?
As its name suggests or chances are, not a CVT has no fixed gear ratios, as it is capable of infinetely varying its ratio as required. Thats because a CVT does not have gears at all, unlike what can be found inside conventional (automatics included) transmissions should you have the inexplicable urge to open one up. Instead, what you find inside a CVT are two conical pulleys lying side by side, the fat end of one cone directly opposite the narrow end of the other cone. One of these cones is then attached to the engine while the other is connected to the vehicles driveline, or that gizmo system that puts power to the wheels. A belt connects the two cones, sliding across both ends of the two. Its "gear ratio" then is determined by the position of the belt relative to which part of the cones its in. So its effective ratio is truly infinite. Pretty nifty, and justifies its name which may initially come across as SanrioThe-happy-sun-makes-pebbles-in-the-sea cryptic.
Driving a CVT car like the City feels like driving a regular automatic slushbox. Almost. The CVT still exhibits some peculiar characteristics uniquely its own. Start from rest at a sharp incline, and the first half-inch or so of gas pedal travel produces nothing but engine noise. The dreaded slipping-clutch feel, thats what it is. On the move, though, there is nothing truly noticeable, save for the fact that the "gearshifts" are as smooth as those found on pricey Euro marques or upscale Jap sedans. No shift-shock at all, or that jerky "thug-blag" thing when the transmission shifts gears. Well, duh, CVT does not have gears.
However, it still feels far from driving an electric golf cart or an arcade bump car. You can still hear the engine revs go up and down its range while the CVT belt shifts its position from parts of the cones to another. It even holds its "gear" when needed, creating a respectable amount of engine braking, which is especially useful when driving downhill. And the aforementioned engine computer management wizardry also allows you to stick around the engines effective power band up to its redline before it "shifts", thereby saving the engine from scattering its entrails across EDSA.
The CVT City even has that nifty steering wheel-mounted "gearshift" buttons, where you can manually row through seven preset "gears" and pretend youre Jacques Villeneuve without the thinning hair or even with the thinning hair. Completely up to you.
Honda is not the first to introduce CVT to production models, nor is it even the first to offer it locally. Mitsubishis latest generation Lancer was available with CVT since its introduction, which preceeded the Honda City by months. Also, some scooters have been CVT-equipped long before cars were.
By offering CVT on entry-level cars, manufacturers are proving that this technology, with its supposed benefits on fuel consumption and efficiency, are quite practical and indicates it may soon mean more vehicles in the future will offer CVTs. Its not reinventing the wheel. Its more like reinventing the machine.